110 thoughts on “Blog #31 – Cultural Imperialism”

1. Elizabeth Hentschel February 5, 2012 at 6:46 pm

   1. I actually do think that there’s an upside to cultural imperialism. Just say that you’re in a foreign country and you don’t speak the language or know where anything is. At times like those it’s very comforting to know there there’s a local Starbucks or Mcdonalds near by. I also don’t get what the big deal is that we’re paying a little extra to have the companies logo on our clothing. If people want to pay for a logo then let them, in order to stay up to date in fashion sometimes you have to do things like that. Another good point is that companies are paying schools to advertise their logo on their clothing. I don’t think that that’s necessarily a bad thing. In an economy like this schools need all the money that they can get. By wearing the companies name/logo on them, which is a very easy task to do, but they also get payed for it. I think that cultural imperialism can be bad, but it can also be good in many situations.

   2. I think that the only way that other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami is to really make their own mega-companies. I think that really the only way that we can prevent super companies such as Mcdonalds and Gatorade from taking over other countries cultures is if they work on making mega-companies of their own. It’s always nice to have small companies that are important to local areas but in order to really preserve their own culture they really need to make their own mega-companies. By doing this they can not only preserve their own country, but their company could one day take down our huge companies that are dominating the world.
2. Lexi Wehbe February 5, 2012 at 6:51 pm

   1. I do think that there can be an up-side to cultural imperialism. I think one of the up-sides would be that it spreads different cultures out to other counties. Like countries that are extremely far from each other geographically and are very different culturally get a taste of what other cultures around the world are like. It could be viewed as an eye-opener, and expand horizons for how people in countries look at other countries. It could give people a sense of unity, because they can relate and realize that they share common interests as those around the world who may seem so different. Although there are many cons when dealing with cultural imperialism, such as working conditions and working ages, preserving the environment, and preserving international labor, there can be a brighter side that is viewed when looking at cultural imperialism. Also, a benefit for America can be seen when they use ideas such as cultural imperialism because it gives them more influence and power.
   2. Other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by promoting their own culture as well as American culture. It doesn’t have to be one or the other, there can be a blending of both cultures. Also, other countries can promote their culture in countries other than their own, and help spread their culture to other places around the world. If other countries followed in American footsteps when dealing with cultural imperialism, struggling to preserve their own identity and culture would not be as big of an issue. Other countries don’t advertise and publicize their identity and culture as much as America, and although that may be because they are not as influential of a country, it is still doable. If other countries make their citizens as attached and excited about their culture as America does to its citizens, it would not be as hard to preserve.
3. Bradley S- 2nd Hour February 5, 2012 at 9:35 pm

   1. Cultural imperialism can be beneficial in two main ways: it brings people together and makes things much easier. “Fitting in” has always been a dream of many Americans; from young toddlers to those in their later years, almost everyone has been subject to conformity and being able to mold into the “status quo.” When one is asked if he’s heard about the latest MacBook, sometimes it can be embarrassing to say no. The other person replies with an awkward, “Oh…” and the conversation ceases to exist. If Apple was the only company to make computers, it would be hard for the other person not to know about the latest and greatest laptop. With more cultural imperialism, we would all be able to relate to each other much more easily. Think of it like this; which question would receive more ‘yes’s: “Have you tried John’s latest homemade mocha mix?” or “Have you tried Starbucks’ Caramel Macchiato?” Because of cultural imperialism, it’s never been easier to pour topics like this into conversations all over the world. Along with bringing people together, cultural imperialism also makes things much easier and quicker in our lives. Envision a world where one could view all of the items on the menu of a coffee shop at the tip of his fingers. In order for this app to exist, it would be probable that the certain coffee shop would have to be quite profitable and have a large group of consumers; therefore, a Starbucks app can save us so much time. Instead of having to decide what to order while on-the-spot, at the counter, we could look up all of our options while driving to the shop (hopefully not really). Cultural imperialism not only unites people, but it also allows many related actions to be easier and quicker.

   2. To better preserve the cultures and identities of countries all over the world and prevent the American consumer tsunami from swallowing them up, more restrictions should be placed on large monopolies. Laws should be made so smaller businesses can stand better chances against the towering big businesses we see today. Larger businesses are more prone to cookie-cutter everything. For example, when comparing a Panera Bread in Kalamazoo and Birmingham, barely anything differs in-between the two locations: the same menu, the same interior decorating techniques–almost the same colored walls. One may say that this may not be a big cultural leap between towns, but if almost nothing was different in this scenario, not much must be different between most locations of this chain–no matter how far across the salty puddle you leap. When I travel, I look forward to being completely absorbed into another region’s cultural: saying goodbye to American and hello to a Dutch party-pancake (which is topped with Asiago cheese and sprinkles). When I turn around to find two large arcs casting their enormous shadows over me, the effect is completely ruined. A small bakery started up by a local would much better suit my desires–it would be more likely to conserve the cultural atmosphere I’m looking for. If countries limited the growth of monopolies and large corporate businesses, it would be easier for these smaller native businesses to compete and thrive in their communities.
4. Erica Gardner February 5, 2012 at 10:18 pm

   1) I think that cultural imperialism destroys a lot of the diversity around the world, but one advantage of this is that it gives people around the world something they can all relate to. I think it’s pretty amazing when people from completely different countries discover that they drink the same coffee or wear the same brand of shoes. Even though it is disturbing how many local companies and products have been displaced by these enormous American corporations, I think it’s important that people from different places are able to find something, no matter how superficial, to relate to. These small, shared values can only contribute to cooperation between people of different backgrounds where hostilities may lie. However, I think that cultural imperialism is doing more harm than good. Last year the orchestra went to Italy and it was pretty shocking to see a gaudy McDonald’s nestled among the gelaterias, drawing customers aware from the more expensive but culturally significant, locally owned businesses. It would be tragic if American corporations replaced all of the traditional businesses in a country.

   2) Countries can preserve their own cultural identity by promoting their own products instead of imported ones. If local celebrities endorsed traditional products and companies, it could serve as a revival for these companies. Fans would be more inclined to buy things that their favorite celebrities buy instead of the mainstream, American based products, and it would foster a national pride. If they can’t do that, they could integrate local traditions with the American based businesses in their area. Maybe they could work out a deal to incorporate local recipes into menus, or traditional art or fashion into products. However, I think it’s pretty difficult to shake off the foreign companies that take over local businesses. It’s probably more effective to prevent them from coming in the first place, rather than trying to remove them afterwards.
5. Allison Kelley February 6, 2012 at 12:23 am

   1. I do think that there is an up-side to cultural imperialism. The positive aspect of cultural imperialism is that other countries get to have some of the high quality brands and companies that, for example, America has. Other countries around the world have Starbucks. In my opinion, Starbucks is a very high quality store that makes great coffee. I honestly don’t know what I would do without their mochas. But really, it is not always a bad thing to have American companies in other countries if the citizens there like the products. If they were so against having the American stores there, then they wouldn’t buy anything from those stores. While McDonald’s may not be the highest quality for food, it is still widely popular because of how quickly you can get a meal, and people like the burgers and fries. If customers want McDonald’s, then why is it such a bad thing to have it beyond American borders (besides the fact that it is really bad for you)?
   2. I think that other cultures can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by creating their own unique logos and products that America doesn’t have. There shouldn’t be American brands everywhere you look. If I was in, say, France, I would not want to eat lunch at Burger King. I would want to eat at an authentic French café. If countries like this could expand on ideas that are unique to their culture, then I think they could become very popular labels (you can’t get crêpes at Burger King!). If there is a lot of advertisement within the country, then the citizens will be more aware of the companies. These countries can also try to prevent the addition of more American companies or the spreading of those that are already there. They have control of what is allowed in their country, so they should use that power to their full advantage if they want to prevent more cultural imperialism!
6. Avery k February 6, 2012 at 12:29 am

   1. I think there is a upside to cultural imperlism up to a certain extent for example when the British took over India many bad things happened like the Indians could not pray, nobody could be Hindu or budist, and the Indians became slaves. But the good thing that came of this cultural imperlism is most of the country was literate and had much better schooling. If the British were not there they would have even more terrible schools than today. My point being is that cultural imperlism Is not bad because good things come of it but if you go overboard and try reforming or changing too many things that is bad.

   2. Countries can preserve their own culture by doing the same thing the U.S does by advertising them selves so they don’t get overwhelmed with our culture. If for examplefrance advertised more stuff in different countries they woul be for famous for their companies just likeamerican ones.
7. Brooke Billings February 6, 2012 at 12:50 am

   1. I do believe that there can be some advantages to cultural imperialism, but the downsides outweigh the benefits. Corporations could argue that they are unifying the world with their universal products and companies; however, all they are really doing is encouraging monopolies and discouraging cultural individualism. When companies expand their stores to other nations, they are stunting the growth of companies native to that country. For example, if McDonald restaurants are placed everywhere in a small nation, how are their native companies expected to flourish? McDonalds will quickly stomp out any competition that could have benefited the smaller nation’s economy. Not only does cultural imperialism hurt the underdog countries, but it hurts the larger imperialist countries as well. When large corporations ship jobs and resources to countries that they attempt to expand in, they hurt their native country’s economy with outsourcing. Accordingly, the larger nation’s workers may struggle to find employment and workers in underdog countries may be subject to abuse and poor working conditions in order to provide a large profit for the company. Finally, with cultural imperialist motives taken by corporations monopolies can quickly emerge, and as seen in history monopolies can be detrimental to workers and the middle class.

   2. I think other countries can preserve their own cultural identity in many ways. First, other countries can be sure to have formidable competition to combat American products. These indigenous companies could be the key to preserving a nation’s independent economy. Also, in a worst case scenario a nation could place protective tariffs on American products. These tariffs should be maintained temporarily, and removed when the country has built up a strong and independent economy. A final action that should be taken by smaller nations to preserve their cultural individualism is to instill strict labor policies to protect their workers. A primary reason large companies endeavor to expand in lesser nations is for cheap and exploitable labor. If these underdog nations do not allow their workers to be taken advantage of, imperialist nations may think twice before barreling its way into a lesser economy.
8. Audrey Kennedy February 6, 2012 at 12:51 pm

   1. I think that there is a possible upside to cultural imperialism. For example, when going to visit a foreign country, people generally suffer from slight culture shock. When looking for a place to eat, it can be comforting to find a place to eat, like McDonalds, that you are familiar with and know what to expect. Also cultural imperialism can help the integration and acceptance of different cultures around the world. Having a McDonalds in China or France might help those countries to appreciate our Culture and country, although having McDonalds represent us is slightly embarrassing. I think that even though there are many bad qualities about imperialism as a whole, cultural imperialism is beneficial since having one thing that can be found around the world unifies us and then can have something in common about our culture. I’m not saying that McDonalds is a good company to do this, but if cultural imperialism continues and grows, hopefully then a new cooperation that is better for us will be created.

   2.I think it is very possible for foreign countries to preserve their identity even with the American consumer tsunami flooding their country. The two reasons that I believe this, is that the American companies spreading all over the world will not take over the world, and that eventually these companies will not be known as “American.” American companies like Starbucks and McDonalds have made a great effort to open up restaurants all over the world, and are continuing to grow. I think that it is impossible for these companies to completely change the cultures and traditions of other countries because if the citizens of foreign countries are getting along fine without these restaurants, then why would they need to change? I also think that eventually these companies will be so wide spread that they will no longer be identified as “American,” more so that they will represent worldly unified businesses. I predict in the future there will be headquarters for these companies around the world and they will all contribute to the business.
9. Spenser Robnett February 6, 2012 at 12:55 pm

   1. Cultural imperialism can be beneficial in many ways, but there is still a major downside to it. First off, cultural imperialism makes people unite in a way that many people don’t realize or often over look. Sure being different is a good thing and sticking out of the crowd is something your parents tell you to do to make sure you have a voice of your own. But the feeling of fitting in with people is what I think is what is the goal for a lot of young people today. When people buy a product, the first thing they think of is what cool person or celebrity would like this and they begin to stick to the status quo. Now this is also beneficial to many businesses and supports our economy. Now, this is a lot like last week’s blog about all of the products that we buy that we don’t know the back story of horrible working conditions. Are you willing to buy a product to fit in if you know what is happening in Asia? This is the question that we have to ask our self.

   2. Countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami but it is going to be tough. First, it’s impossible to block out a whole other nation culturally, so that’s one part. Next, you are going to have to produce way more culture, whether it is pop culture or whatever to keep your roots in your country. It’s not hard to do this in the U.S. because we keep our main culture groups from other countries in little cities branched off our largest culture centers in America (i.e. New York City and Los Angeles). It also feels nice to go to another country and try new thing; I don’t look forward to eating McDonalds and Pizza Hut when I go to Japan. I want the spicy wasabi and live octopus. Many countries do a great job of keeping American cultural imperialism bottled up.
10. Kaitlin Flaherty February 6, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    Cultural Imperialism

    1.) Yes I do think that there is an upside to cultural imperialism. If you are going to a different country with a totally different culture, suffering from minor culture shock would not be that uncommon. To me, it would be very comforting to have a McDonald’s or Wendy’s to go to, where you know what to expect and where you can go to try to feel a little bit less home sick. For example in India it is very popular and traditional to eat cat and dog. I really would not want to eat that (and I know most Americans would not want to eat this either), so I find the thought of having a McDonald’s, Wendy’s or a Taco Bell nearby so I wouldn’t have to eat dog or cat. I think that cultural imperialism has some good benefits for American travelers, but I can understand how countries can find cultural imperialism as a negative thing too.

    2.) I think that countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the “American Consumer Tsunami”. I feel like if countries really want to keep their own culture and identity they should just flat out so NO to the American mega companies. Or if a country is somewhat opposed to the “American Consumer Tsunami” the country should have the right to pick and choose what mega companies they want to allow in their country. Or the country could make laws and policies limiting the number of stores/ shops/ restaurants an American company can have in their country (ex: McDonalds can only have 4 restaurants per major city). Also if the country wanted to keep their culture and identity, they should try to negotiate with the American mega companies about changing the main logo or label in their product when it comes into their country.
11. Hank Wikol February 6, 2012 at 2:08 pm

    1. I do think that there can be an upside to cultural imperialism because it helps bring money to some countries that need it and brings diversity. However, I do believe that the down side outweighs the upside. There are some countries that don’t have enough money to build enough stores for their population. If a franchise like McDonald’s or Starbucks moved there, they would bring more money to the area and improve the economy. Also, if these big franchises come to these poor countries with their money, it will not only improve the economy but it will also give more people jobs there. But the real problem is that when too many of these large corporations take over an area. If a big corporation expands to another nation and has a ton of locations, that could destroy indigenous corporations and take money away from that country. Cultural imperialism in my opinion has the ability to destroy a small country’s economy.
    2. I think that other countries can preserve their own culture and not be overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami. I think that the governments of these countries need to stop letting these big corporations come in and destroy their local companies. They simply need to tell these big corporations that you can only this amount of stores per area or something like that. I also think that they need to pass laws that will allow these smaller local companies to stand a chance. It’s unlikely that a local coffee shop is going to be able to compete with a large chain like Starbucks. They should make laws and regulations that will benefit the local companies. But ultimately it starts with the population of that country. Their citizens at some point have to decide to help their own country. Instead of going to get a burger off the dollar menu, they should spend a few extra dollars to help their own country.
12. Alex Contis February 6, 2012 at 2:30 pm

    1.) There is a definite upside to cultural imperialism. We live in a world today that is run through the effortless connections we have made over time. Yes, imperialism in the company regard has monopolizing tendencies, but nonetheless it is still productive. The products and companies that are on the winning side of this cultural imperialism rely greatly on the advertisements that reach the masses, and they ultimately benefit from it. Some of the haters out there will hate on the imperialist ways, saying that it is much like Social Darwinism and only the fittest of companies survive; however, when you think about it, don’t you want the best product from the best company? The American consumer chooses to purchase the items/services that it does, and if the public keeps wanting to purchase Starbucks coffee and not Caribou then all the power to them. The fascinating fact of cultural imperialism is that it helps bind people from all over the world together. The same fries you’re eating at McDonald’s are also being enjoyed in China, Africa, and Australia at this exact moment. This cultural upheaval makes our ever shrinking world an even smaller place.
    2.) It takes a lot of work to compete with the big dogs. If you ever even begin to desire starting your own shoe company, Nike and Adidas will be sure to stomp you out before you can even see your dream. (hahaha stomping, shoes, so funny) The consumer market is a jungle, and it is quite possible that the little kitty can get mighty intimidated from the large jungle cats; however, the big cats were once kittens too. Every mega-company got its start some where, some have just been around much longer to flourish than others. The only way to dethrone such dominant forces, is to become a dominant force yourself. The general public benefits from competition, it brings lower prices, more jobs, it’s a win-win situation. Other countries need to build their own boats if the want to ever stand a chance in not getting engulfed by the American tsunami.
13. LeDea Bond February 6, 2012 at 3:41 pm

    1. Yes, I think there could be an upside to cultural imperialism. Cultural imperialism is when countries impose their cultural values on other nations. Today the U.S is pushing into some of the other cultures of other countries in the world. Some people believe that cultural imperialism is a good thing and that it is beneficial to the entire planet. Other people believe that cultural imperialism is a bad thing and consider it as a threat. I think there is definitely an upside to cultural imperialism. I think the upside of cultural imperialism is it makes things a lot easier. I think entering a foreign country that you aren’t used to, can be very overwhelming. Having places and things familiar to you from your own country can make things a lot easier. If I were to enter another country I would find it comforting that some of the places look familiar to those in my own country. There are definitely upsides to cultural imperialism.

    2. I think other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the Americans. Making and promoting their own products is how the other countries can preserve their own culture and identity. Americans have a strong effect on other countries and it makes them change things dealing with their own culture and identity. I think when the other countries promote their own products they will be bringing in more of their own culture and identity back into the country. Even though countries want to preserve their own culture I think there is still a way to protect their culture and adopt some of America’s new ways. There should be a way a country can be original by having their own culture and identity but still take ideas from others. When you promote your own products more than the American product more people will buy it. You would be preserving your own culture and identity based on the products you promote. Other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami.
14. Shayna Brickman February 6, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    1) I don’t think there is an upside to cultural imperialism. To me, I think that this ruins the country’s distinct and original culture. For me, if I was to go to China or Europe or somewhere different, I wouldn’t want to see a McDonalds and all the typical American type cultural things. In my opinion, these sorts of mixes ruin the culture. When I go somewhere different I want to see and experience the reason that makes their culture different from ours whether it’s food or anything else. I also think that this leads to the cheap labor in China and the child slaves, because in China they can manufacture it cheaper and sell it for more, therefore the company can make a bigger profit. It ruins the diverse cultures and begins to blend every culture into one big category.

    2) I think the other countries can preserve their own culture and identity by doing a little mix of both. It’s not like other countries are going to completely cut out all the things that Americanize them, but at the same time I think they need to keep their own culture in some ways. I think they need to find the perfect in between of American culture and their own culture. I think they can do this by creating their own big companies. They also need to find their own way to advertise and create their own big brand logos. If they made these companies better advertised and bigger then their citizens would want to shop at these companies, and honestly so would Americans. When we go somewhere unique and exotic we want their cool culture too. Whether its food or clothes we want to experience everything. I know it may seem that if you started out as a new small company the bigger companies would automatically beat you out, but at the same time all those companies were in your situation once. Every country needs to start making their own companies and stick to their own culture if they ever want to compete with America.
15. Marisa W. February 6, 2012 at 4:04 pm

    1. While cultural imperialism may seem like a bad thing, there can be an upside depending on what aspects of a culture are being spread. For example, let’s say a cure for a horrible disease that has been plaguing the world for years is finally discovered in a certain country. If access to that cure was kept exclusive to that one country, not only would the disease still spread in other parts of the world, but that country may be viewed as selfish. Therefore, the medical leaders of that country would want to find a way to make it so that everyone knew what that cure was and to ensure worldwide distribution of the product. This could be done in the form of a new company or brand that manufactures and/or distributes the product. In short, any aspect of a certain culture that could be beneficial to the world should not be held back.
    2. Other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the “American consumer tsunami” by limiting the influence of foreign companies to certain areas. In addition to this, certain areas and/or facilities could be designated primarily for cultural education and preservation. By doing so, the aspects of a culture that could easily be drowned in foreign influence and lost to the ages could be salvaged through today’s youth and preserved for posterity. Perhaps another way to preserve a country’s culture would be to spread it to other countries as American culture is being spread. Of course, there is already evidence of this in many places (i.e. Chinatown), but there needs to be some unmistakable symbol of a culture that can be seen worldwide, just like some American companies (i.e. McDonald’s). Maybe another country could create their own super franchise and extend it to all parts of the world.
16. Jesse Yaker February 6, 2012 at 4:05 pm

    1. I think there is an up-side to cultural imperialism. I think for not just me or people my age, but for everyone in America to know that if they went to a different country, such as France or Germany in a whole different continent, and know that if the food there is not their favorite, that they can go to a McDonald’s or a Taco Bell. It’s comforting to be able to buy a food that they have eaten for years and know what it tastes like. If someone were to go to a country and think they had bad food, then they wouldn’t eat and it would be a horrible vacation! I also think that people in different cultures will be also to experience different foods and get a different taste of another culture. An example is Taco Bell, now it may not be exactly mexican food, but if you really, really love Taco Bell, then it is close enough to real mexican food that, odds are you, will like authentic mexican food.

    2. I think other countries can get their own culture more involved at their restaurants. They can get their own version almost of the restaurant. That is if they really want the products that they are getting. If they don’t really want the imported stuff, then they should just not use the imported stuff. If they need the imported products then they really shouldn’t want to change it, they should have just kept it the way they were made and get the new cultural changes in their society. They also could use some ideas of the different restaurants and just kind of change the logo, the name, and even the products. So all in all, I really think that if they really need the imported goods, they should just get their own version and make the restaurant almost one of their own.
17. Maddi Gonte February 6, 2012 at 4:13 pm

    1. In my perspective, it is the term imperialism that we have learned to cringe from, what with the many wars and harsh discrimination that it’s caused in the unit that we are currently studying. However, a synonym for cultural imperialism, if speculated optimistically, could be sharing one’s culture. It is important to refrain from being oblivious to the cultures around the world, because otherwise we wouldn’t be able to communicate with and understand the needs of other countries while commercial trading, making deals, or other international on-goings are in action. In conclusion, international cultural imperialism, when violence is absent, is not only very beneficial, but necessary. Cultural imperialism within the U.S. and at our schools is also not all too bad. At the current economic state, we should feel comforted that there are such easy ways to gain money without doing much work. It’s not as if they’ve forced schools to promote their company, they’re simply making a deal. It’s our job as the consumers to use our brains and decide where we want to put our money. We shouldn’t let ourselves be brainwashed through the harmless propaganda. However, if one does choose to spend their money on a sweatshirt with a company’s logo on it, then it’s their decision. The company’s are not at fault.
    2. It’s definitely possible for other countries to preserve their own cultures. Although the American culture is undoubtedly strong and is constantly spreading, a blend of the two cultures would be a wonderful way to balance the two. For example, they can maintain their culture, but add a McDonalds or a Starbucks here and there. However, if the people are tempted by further reforming their country in order to match America, there’s nothing wrong with modernizing.
18. Eli Winer February 6, 2012 at 4:46 pm

    1. I believe that there is not an up side to cultural imperialism because forcing your ideals on to others is just wrong. Everyone should acknowledge and appreciate other people’s religious beliefs and respect their cultural differences. It is these differences that make humans so unique. Yes it is true that these differences, mainly religious ones, have lead to certain tragedies and even war, but if we can just suck up our religious and cultural pride and just accept everyone for who they are, then maybe their would be peace in the world. We should all take the time in our lives to learn and experience other cultures than our own and gain a greater understanding of the world around us. If you only know your culture and don’t pay any attention to others then how can you judge them? Go out and experience new things and then learn to appreciate the other people in the world from another viewpoint.
    2. I think that other countries can keep a firm grasp of their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by keeping a strong pride for their religious or cultural beliefs and never feel ashamed to be what they are or to be where they are from. This may sound like it is contrast with my answer to the first question, but you should keep a strong pride and belief in your culture while still staying open minded and accepting of others. All religious and cultural beliefs are ok unless they interfere with the pursuit of happiness. Other countries are very cultural and the citizens of those nations often and majorly stay true to those cultural beliefs as they have been taught. America is referred to often as the great American melting pot. This meaning that America is filled with many cultures that make us up as a whole. You should never lose sight of your cultural background, but still keep an open mind to others and respect your surrounding religions and cultures in the world.
19. Madison Lennox February 6, 2012 at 4:55 pm

    1. I do think there is an upside to cultural imperialism. It brings people together, and makes things much easier for these people to “fit in”. Fitting in has always been a huge thing with Americans. People try and mold themselves to fit within the “status quo”. For example, lets say you’re having a conversation with someone, and they bring up a product you have never heard of before. So, when they ask you if you have heard of it, you might just say yes to avoid feeling left out. I think cultural imperialism gives people a sense of conformity, in which they can find things similar with themselves and the other people around them. Also, it could be a big advantage for America. Since most of the world’s major corporations come from the US, cultural imperialism can give them more recognition, influence and power among other nations.
    2. Other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by promoting their own culture along with American culture. You could choose one over the other, but it would just be much easier if you were to blend each of the cultures, by promoting both equally. Since American companies get famous celebrities to endorse their products in America, as well as all over the world, then the other countries should do the same. They could start using their own local celebrities to endorse their own products, which would possibly make them more popular than the American products. Also, countries could try and incorporate traditional foods of the country into the menu of the restaurant chain, giving the restaurant a source of identity, and making it distinct, instead of the generic restaurant. I think other countries just need to make their citizens as prideful about their culture as Americans are.
20. Natalie S. 3rd Hour February 6, 2012 at 4:59 pm

    1)I think there can be an upside to cultural imperialism because it makes the world a little bit smaller and brings people closer together. If there were no common threads between people around the world, tension and fighting would be everywhere. If the world can agree on some things, it makes people more relatable and thus less likely to fight with each other. Even in smaller circles, like schools, “imperialism” can be a good thing. Yes, being unique is important as well, but having common interests and tastes brings people together in ways that other things can’t. Have you ever tried to have a conversation with someone that you have nothing in common with? Well, chances are there actually was SOMETHING you had in common but nothing important. Now imagine that happening to EVERYONE you talked to, but with absolutely nothing in common this time. Not even a shared interest in McDonald’s or Starbucks.
    2)I think the main way for other cultures to maintain their own identity without being overwhelmed by American imperialism is to educate the new generations (and other countries) on the traditions of their country. If the culture is preserved, going to Starbucks every once in a while won’t change that. Countries should also limit the amount of a certain American country in a region. Just because we have a McDonald’s on every single exit of our highways, doesn’t mean Australia needs that. They’d probably be able to preserve their own culture if the number of McDonald’s were cut-back. Finally, the countries with the most original cultures are the poorest ones. These are the ones that can’t afford American companies so they use their own culture and methods of doing things and fair just fine. If countries were to use their own traditions more, there could be a better balance.
21. Alina Steinberg 3rd hour February 6, 2012 at 5:06 pm

    1. I think that some parts of cultural imperialism can be useful in some ways. For one, it will spread different culture through out the entire world and provide a different perspective or way of life to what could have been a very one sided. It could be a way for more cultures to come together, with something in common, however if gaining something in common means loss of diversity in a way that prevents culture from doing what they believe, this upside may be more of a down side. I think there should be a happy medium, cultures should be allowed to live the way they are used to but a little something different never hurt anyone, it could even be comforting in some ways. Everything in moderation.

    2. I think other cultures can preserve their identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by producing more culture for themselves. It would be very hard to do and would take a lot of work, considering how much more advanced American business already is, and considering the amount of time building up enough reputation would take, but if countries are feeling like they are loosing their cultures it is a step in the right direction for them. America has these big, world wide corporations like McDonalds and Starbucks, I think the other countries need something, whether it be a cooperation or product that can overpower or at least match the power of these bug American businesses. If another country can gain enough popularity in something of their own, maybe there won’t be such a high need for American “domination.” If the American consumers are such a big deal to these other countries, I believe it is up to their government to find a way to manage these large consumers.
22. Alec Barnes February 6, 2012 at 5:22 pm

    1. I think the idea of Cultural Imperialism is a two edged sword, we can sit here and discuss everything that it’s done to advance certain countries. As I’m sure that statement will create a serious amount of controversy, I’m sure I’m in need of some explaination. In terms of “advancing other countries” I mean giving them an opportunity to “look at our books”, figuratively. By allowing our culture to be viewable to the world, we give other countries a chance to experiment using ours. They have the ability to then make up their minds whether or not they like our style of living and choose to adopt it, or see the flaws and choose to reject it. Either way we have put the ball in their court, letting them make the decisions, without our hands involved. We, ourselves, would be a model (maybe not a perfect model, but a model none the less) and other countries then choose to either be like us, or learn to coexist with us.
    2. I think that countries must be vigilant; they have to be intense with their cultural preservation. The world cannot limit the consumer, abolish the desire for a certain way of life, but at the same time, for the sake of diversity, you have to keep your own culture alive and strong. In all honesty, in whatever way possible, it is essential for a country to keep its culture, maybe even mandate that you limit how many outside businesses can set up shop in a country. And even though that sounds extremely regulatory, it seems necessary, not to limit the business, but to save the country from being overrun. Do I think a country can coexist with our lifestyle and still keep their culture? I think it would be extremely difficult, but I think it’s probably possible, if it means enough to the people.
23. Shounak V. February 6, 2012 at 5:35 pm

    1. Yes, I think there can be an up-side to cultural imperialism. It can spread diversity and beliefs around the world. This can help so in a time of crisis, countries can understand and believe what their opponents are saying. Spreading diversity can never really be too horrible of a thing; it’s when people go overboard, that’s when it becomes a problem. That’s why I also think there are many down sides to cultural imperialism. People, who want to spread their culture to a lot of other people, tend to go way overboard. They just want everyone else to think like them, and that’s when it becomes a problem, and war starts to occur. We cannot just enforce out thoughts and beliefs into people who don’t want it. You can’t just expect people to bow down to you and give up. If they don’t like what you’re trying to do to them, they will fight, and that’s how big wars get started.
    2. I think countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami first by not having so many American based things in their country. This enhances America’s culture, and decreases their own. If they really don’t want those kinds of things in their country then why have so many of them to start off with? They should stop copying America, and just do their own thing. They should limit the number of American based clothing brands or restaurants so that they can implement their own style and choice. This will help the people living their forget about Americas culture. Also they should decrease the signaling of Americas TV programs to their country. As the article says, having American TV program on the citizens TV, just enhances the knowledge and thought of America’s culture, not your own. If they really want to keep their culture and identity they would stop many of the United States TV programs from their own citizen’s TV. This would help preserve their culture a lot.
24. Kristina Satullo February 6, 2012 at 5:41 pm

    1. I think there is an upside to cultural imperialism. One benefit is it brings cultures together by giving them all something to relate to. Even if it is only the type of brand clothing or kind of food, it still shows that people from all over the world still enjoy the same things. It also gives people in other countries a sense of the culture in our country. It also makes things easier when visiting other countries. It’s important that when you see a different country that you get to experience their culture, but it also helps to make you feel at home. For example, if you are away from home for a long period of time for business or what not it is nice to be able to have something that reminds you of home. Cultural imperialism can be bad if it gets out of hand. If it goes too far it can hurt and destroy other country’s culture, but if it is kept under control it can be very beneficial.
    2. There are many ways other countries can preserve their own cultural identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami. One way is that countries can promote and advertise their products more. A reason that American products are so popular is that they are very abundant and advertised heavily. If other countries did the same with their products then people may be inclined to buy those products instead. Counties can also try to develop restrictions for the amount of products a country can bring into another country. This will help the local business because they will have less competition. Other countries could also try to make their own mega companies to help preserve their culture. The mega companies would lower prices of their products which would make their products easier to market and sell.
25. Makenzie S February 6, 2012 at 5:42 pm

    1. Yes I do believe that there can be an up-side to cultural imperialism. A few up sides are, if you go to different country then it might be very hard for you to fit in and you might find some comfort in something that is familiar to you. If you can’t speak the language that is spoken where ever you go to visit, then it will make it easier for you if you already know what you want, for instance if you were to go to Starbucks in another country, then you wouldn’t have to worry so much because you would already know what they have to offer. Also I personally don’t think that it is such a bad thing if people wear logos that are advertising the store that they bought it from, and if a school’s sporting team wears a company’s name/logo then what really is the harm? Cultural imperialism gives us something that we can have in common with others around the world and it can bring us closer together. But there is always another side to look at it from, and it could be seen as bad because it can stop other countries from having diversity and being unique.
    2. I think that other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami if they create their own things. They can make their own stores and logos and things of that sort. I know it might get pretty tough out in the business world because the big businesses out there will probably try to destroy any little things that get in their way of making money. But I still think that they could make it by. I mean everyone likes something that is unique, new and fresh. And people do like to honor their own culture, so if they open up their own companies and try to stop America from putting any more of their companies in that country then I think that the local companies will be able to get more costumers and be a greater success.
26. Colleen Feola February 6, 2012 at 5:54 pm

    1. Yes, I think there can be an up-side to cultural imperialism. I think that cultural imperialism promotes diversity to a certain degree but shouldn’t allow one country to mirror another country’s’ culture. I think that cultural imperialism helps to encourage the values of freedom of expression and equality by giving options to consumers. Although having options is good, embracing traditional culture is very important. I think that having the same business located in many countries unites the world and promotes the acceptance and approval of many different cultures. For example, I love to eat Chinese and Thai food, but if I had to eat it every day, I would get tired of it. Asian food is not a “norm” for Americans, but it is always nice to have different choices and mix it up once in a while! Having the option to eat something other than American food is comforting. If cultural imperialism is to an extreme, it becomes invasive. I think there are many advantages and disadvantages, but cultural imperialism needs to be controlled so that traditions and customs can be maintained.
    2. I think that countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami. I think the most important way to do so is by promoting and advertising local products. This can be accomplished by hiring local actors to star in commercials and on billboards. However, hiring foreign celebrities to star in these commercials can also be beneficial because they are endorsing your product in their nation. Secondly, competition to American products is imperative. The local businesses need to find a way to improve the quality of their product at the same or below the price of the American companies. Also, the country needs to protect their products, perhaps by placing tariffs on imported goods. By doing so, the country can stabilize their economy and promote their cultural imperialism to other nations.
27. Grace Lee February 6, 2012 at 5:59 pm

    1. There are upsides to cultural imperialism: successful corporations and a united world. Corporations are obviously doing something right if they have stores and products in countries all over the world. It does come with downsides (horrible working conditions in some countries, along with the use of child labor), but that doesn’t change the fact that companies like Starbucks and McDonald’s is extremely successful. People like it and that’s the biggest reason they’ve been able to expand so much. A major resulting factor cultural imperialism is that it really brings all nations together. With sales in several countries, not only do these companies become very well known, they do the priceless act of becoming a common food, drink, clothing, etc. amongst people. Bringing people together isn’t easy, so the fact that these large corporations can do that is amazing and very significant.

    2. First, other countries don’t have to take in these American products. They could start companies in their own countries and expand if they are great. Great, meaning that they satisfy a large portion of the consumers. A company’s successful doesn’t necessarily depend on its ideas or how many countries they’re in; they depend on what the consumers like to taste and see. Yes, consumers’ reasons for liking products can come from quality, and creativity; nevertheless, it’s all about the buyers. The companies they create could make culturally unique products or they could make sure their name is publicized. If they don’t care about publicity and international success, good for them. Once again, the consumers decide on their success, not their growth. I think the biggest factor is letting American companies come in and take control over their own growth. They don’t have to allow that. If their citizens seem to want these products, they should be informed that it could take away the country’s own culture and identity.
28. Sam Edwards February 6, 2012 at 6:01 pm

    1. What a fun topic cultural imperialism is. There are some benefits that result from this type of imperialism. One such advantage is that eventually everyone (by everyone, I mean a vast majority) will start liking the same things, practicing the same religions, wearing the same clothes (happening already), and maybe even thinking the same ways. That sameness allows the government to manage their people much easier. The downside of this sameness is the lack of diversity, maybe even the eventual inbreeding of people from across the world, which would make for some very interesting looking people. Also, wars might even stop because most everyone has the same opinion, radicals would be on a decline, centralism would be at a high! Hell, under ideal conditions, socialism would be reached. However, since people are different, everything aforementioned will likely not occur; that is of course assuming people will continue to have their own opinions. Let’s also hope that hypocrites don’t rise among the radicals, causing radicals to turn on one another, thus destroying many things due to petty civil wars.

    2. It would be possible for a culture to preserve itself, but it would be extraordinarily hard. Preservation can be ensured to happen if the next generation isn’t exposed to the big new culture that’s encroaching every day, so they only learn one culture. Hybridization of the two cultures could also happen; it’s not quite American, it’s not quite what it used to be. Going to an extreme, there could always be a culture that isolates itself completely and would no longer interact with the outside world. That’s when inbreeding would happen and the population would die off thanks to genetic illnesses if they were NOT helped by the outside world or induct people (either by force or choice) to become members of their maybe broken and elitist society.
29. Nick Benedetti February 6, 2012 at 6:12 pm

    1. I feel like there is a bit of an upside to cultural imperialism. With cultural imperialism most people would have the same products to do the same work so service on these products could be done easier. If almost everyone had a HP laptop then we could train large amounts of people how to fix a HP laptop so if it needs fixing it will be cheaper because the labor won’t require as much specialization. The downsides to cultural imperialism are much larger though. With only a few culturally acceptable options available the prices of these goods would increase greatly. There would be no competition by the multiple off brands because they would be considered obsolete by the majority of people so they wouldn’t generate enough revenue to stay in business. Also with cultural imperialism there would be less diversity. It would be hard to be your own person, because you would be put in a “cookie-cutter” and would be forced to buy the same things as everyone else.
    2. It is very hard for other countries to preserve their own cultural identity because of the heavy influence by Americans. The ways countries could keep their own identity would put a lot of strain on their economy because most likely these countries’ economies are heavily influenced by these companies. You could cut out certain products commercials in your country to stop people from knowing about these products, but this would cost the television companies because they would lose advertisements. They could put heavy tariffs on goods but then America would get mad and throw a hissy fit. The only way to preserve the countries culture fully is to make better products that are commonly accepted in that country. If the countries producers can make their products cheaper and substantially better then that country could maintain their cultural identity. It would be very hard for a country to maintain their cultural identity from the American identity, but anything is possible.
30. kevin talty February 6, 2012 at 6:16 pm

    Cultural imperialism upside is that it can make it easier to connect with different people and when you are in a different country you can find something from your home country. It would make it easier connect with different people cause will give you something to talk about. For example, if you were traveling to a different country and you recently met someone there it will give you something to relate about like what your favorite thing at McDonalds is or your favorite shoe from Nike. The other thing it will do was help you from getting home sick. If you were traveling away from home for a while it would be extremely comforting to find that you have a place that you can seat down and eat at that reminds you of home.
    I think countries can preserve their culture and keep out the American culture by establishing tariffs, promote national pride, or boycott the American stores. What establishing a tariff would do is stop the companies from coming to your territory at first because the company wouldn’t gain as much money because have to pay more money when shipping in supplies. Promoting of national pride would help preserve the culture because if you make the citizens proud to be that culture so they don’t want to change to a different not as looked-up-on culture. The one that I think would be the most successful way to stop the invading American culture is to boycott the goods. This is because it would be nonviolent and no lives would be lost while nation pride idea might cause hatred towards other people. This will also cause the companies to leave complete cause if their products aren’t selling there means there is no profit so will leave to a more profitable areas. They should not completely stop the culture from getting in with laws against it because this might form hatred towards the American culture.
31. Nick Gruich February 6, 2012 at 6:25 pm

    1. Yes, there can be an upside to cultural imperialism because companies can become very internationally known and create jobs. The larger a company gets the more jobs that are created for people in countries all around the world that these companies are in. For example Nike and McDonalds are known across the globe to countries and are the most popular brand in their department. Nike had the swoosh symbol which is a key part in its marketing campaign because anyone can recognize the swoosh on sports products and other pieces of clothing. McDonalds is known for American food and having many locations which are always convenient. There are thousands located all over the world and has a large draw everywhere. Another Brand of food that I have personal knowledge of having a large impact is KFC. KFC is by far the most popular fast food place in Japan and is very popular.
    2. I think that other cultures can preserve their own culture and not be overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by being more corporately competitive by having lowering prices and better products and competing fairly and appealing to their own country the most because those are the consumers they know best and they will have the least trouble getting. If they appeal to their own country then they will keep their own culture in their country by drowning out the American products and making them much friendlier to their home citizens. The government should do a better job of regulating fair competition in these countries and not having an entire country be a cheap labor force for another (US and China). Also if a country sets better trade regulations for companies then that will maybe better establish a solid ground for competing corporations in these struggling countries.
32. Kevin Chien February 6, 2012 at 6:37 pm

    1. I think there can be an upside to cultural imperialism; however, there are also some downsides. An upside to cultural imperialism is that plenty of people outside the United States may enjoy the American companies’ products and that other countries can experience the same levels of satisfaction and handiness that we do. For example, most people praise McDonalds and other fast food joints because of the quickness and the convenience. If somebody in say, Great Britain, wants a quick bite to what’s more convenient than McDonalds? It’s not so much a bad thing that our companies are spreading to other countries if the people in those countries actually appreciate it. Although, a downside to cultural imperialism is that our companies may be hurting the local companies that stay true to their own culture. When the American companies expand their products to outside nations they are essentially preventing the growth of the native companies already there. So while many people from foreign countries enjoy the American “tsunami,” the local companies are the ones that are hurting.

    2. I think that other countries could preserve their own identity and culture without being overwhelmed by the Americans consumer tsunami is to encourage local companies that stay true to their own culture and create their own unique products. The foreign countries can still enjoy American products while enjoying their own but they should encourage their own products more than the American ones. I know that if I were to visit somewhere like Italy, I would want to experience everything the Italian culture has to offer including the traditional food and drinks. I wouldn’t really want to see McDonalds infesting every street corner. Other countries could preserve their culture by promoting their own companies more than the foreign ones and create their own unique products that become as synonymous to them as McDonalds is to America.
33. Gabrielle Clary 3rd hr February 6, 2012 at 6:51 pm

    1. There is an upside to cultural imperialism because it makes the country look good. It makes people from other countries want the lifestyle of wherever the companies are based in which attracts people to move to that country. It brings revenue for countries; people buy things from other countries bringing the stock value of that company up. The bad thing about is that the products may not be manufactured in the country where the company is based, if it was that would really help the country to go and stay on top. And with countries like America where their celebrities are known around the world, whatever they do or wear is being magnified so if they wear something that is American everybody is going to want it. Other upsides are, more business traffic in other countries, corporations will expand and put offices in other countries so they can fulfill their customers’ needs in that region.

    2. Other countries can preserve their cultures by raising tariffs on foreign goods. And pushing their cultural products into more stores. Plus they can partner up with big brand name companies making products that go along with their product that can be sold around the world or just sold in their country. The countries also could ban certain things from being sold but that would be considered communism, but it depends on what kind of values that country has. The country could also take whatever cultural imperialists good and change it to fit their culture, so it could be customized for that country. Countries could also ban big corporations from having any business with businesses in their country unless it benefits the country in a good way. Plus countries can start encouraging to push their culture around the world.
34. Anna Lockwood February 6, 2012 at 6:52 pm

    1. Yes I do believe that there can be an up-side to cultural imperialism, the reason I say this is because I believe that when you’re traveling you do want to see lots of new things. But let’s say that you are in a completely different area and you don’t know anyone around you and they all speak a different language. It’s nice to see a Starbucks or a McDonalds and just go in there and kind of re-gain yourself back. Letting yourself know that yes you are in a different country but that doesn’t mean you have to let go of your culture. And many young people today all around use many of the same products, which is not necessarily a bad thing. In a way it brings everyone closer together, to know that when your drinking a Starbucks that someone in Australia is probably drinking the same thing as you.
    2. Well there would be many hardships that you would have to go through in order to compete with the U.S. I mean we have one of the largest manufacturing industries in the world. And to keep our products out of your country, you would have to basically block off all U.S products from entering your country and since we are so large in manufacturing. That could easily damage your economy. I mean if you had a great location, where you could manufacture and grow your own crops. You would not need any of the United States industries. But many countries do not have that privilege of having a great location for growing and manufacturing your own crops. A lot of countries do need the United States, and even though we expand into these countries that does not necessarily say that “we are coming to take over” all it says is we want to expand our business even further.
35. Jacob gluski February 6, 2012 at 6:52 pm

    1. There most diffidently is a benefit to cultural imperialism. Now I will try my best not to speak on whether one culture is truly better than one or another. But to speak to what I think one of the main benefits of cultural imperialism, the culture that would be doing the imperializing must be very powerful and influential, and what other country, asides from the U.S., would be able to conduct such a vast war on other cultures for the past 80 years? The benefit to which I have been alluding to is none other than that if all the people on earth were of the same cultural dissent then there would most likely be fewer wars. Obviously this has not happened, many U.S. companies (and our government working with others) have so hastily tried to squash and throttle other cultures that they are responding in a way that is slightly counter-productive in terms of the path that we must travel in order to reach a more harmonious world. The U.S. had tried to Americanize all of the world, and with the exception of a few penguins in Antarctica the U.S. has succeeded to some degree. But the U.S. has also failed in many regards. The U.S. would love to see the rest of the world solely buying goods from American businesses (even if manufactured elsewhere). But we have forced many countries to try and assimilate to our values much much too quickly. There are places in the far east and middle east that are what many U.S. citizens would consider ultra-conservative (I speak towards their values not their political beliefs). Cultures such as those found in India and Saudi Arabia, are examples of such. But where some of these types of cultures might feel perfectly fine (BY FAR NOT A RULE) there are many occurrences where things such as an arranged marriage might go ok, but in the U.S. and Europe it might have been considered a basic violation of human (usually women, because they don’t want to be wed to a groom or are too young) rights. It is a major discrepancy like that between the two cultures that lead many countries in the region to reject Americanization completely, oftentimes sowing the seeds of tension, discord, and unrest. Of course other U.S. policies have influenced that as well, but many people none the less in this region are more ill-disposed against the U.S. because of cultural imperialism (again among other things). As I said before if it is done slowly and with consideration to the native culture I believe that cultural imperialism could contribute to a more peaceful world.
    2. Japan poses as a great example for how they can try to preserve their culture. Many artists have been commissioned to try and preserve national artistic products and styles (calligraphy, the unique architecture, and poetry ect. ect.). These are artists are called national treasures. It was almost an emergency action taken by the government as a measure to preserve their culture as many felt it was on the verge of extinction. This doesn’t protect them from new cultural influences, but it tries to preserve their past and oftentimes it is important to remember history. Many nations teach elements of their own culture in schooling. But throughout many of the poorest countries in the world, the schoolchildren are being Americanized. In some cases it is really a better solution than their culture of violence. Another way countries should try to express their culture is through their traditional foods. I went on a trip to Israel; sadly much of the country reflects only American cultural values along with religious values. One thing the U.S. has really flourished with is the expansion of American eating habits, cuisine, and most influential of all fast food. You can get your midnight Mc’Ds in almost any country on earth. In nearly every first world country on earth you are not more than a few minutes away from an American brand. With all of the influence and pull the U.S. has around the world it is hard to imagine how a country could even try to completely resist U.S. culture.
36. Katie Sullivan - 4th hour February 6, 2012 at 7:05 pm

    1. I do think that there can be an upside to cultural imperialism. One good point made in the blog was schools using brands of equipment and food in vending machines. Right now, many schools are in need for more money. By promoting some of those brands, they can receive the needed money. Having the huge brands across could possibly help different countries accept each other because we wear, eat, and use the same products. Cultural imperialism can give people across the world things that can relate to each other with. But there are some huge downsides to cultural imperialism, which could out weigh the good ones. I will use McDonalds and an example. Yes, it might be nice while traveling to a different country to see something familiar, like a McDonalds. But wouldn’t you want to experience the culture from that country. I think the cultural imperialism takes away from a lot important individual traits from other countries. Soon it will take over the world and there will be no difference from America to any other country.
    2. I think that other countries can preserve their own cultures by promoting their own companies. Other countries have so many products that we don’t have here. If they would expand, we could get a taste of their culture. The world seems to be overwhelmed by the number of American monopolies. I’m not saying that other countries should try to create more monopolies; they should just try to expand their cultures like America has done. With the issues of monopolies, there should be better control of them. They are truly taking over the world. Smaller businesses are disappearing because of the control from the huge monopolies. Like I said above, when I travel I want to experience the new cultures. I don’t want to get the same meals from the same restaurants I can go to back home.
37. Ben Bejune February 6, 2012 at 7:05 pm

    Cultural imperialism has its downs sides and upsides. The bad part about cultural imperialism is that it kills small companies and businesses that would otherwise be producing their goods and providing more competition for the market thus ensuring a better product. This means that if somehow Starbucks was to somehow eliminate all coffee completion and become a monopoly their product quality would probably go down because of the lack of competition. The upside of cultural imperialism is that people from all over the world are finding things that they never thought that they had it common with each other. For example if there were to be a new student from Russia to come to our school I am sure that they would were Nike’s or other similar products and we as students would have something to talk about. Cultural imperialism also brings many new innovations to our society because more people have access to similar technology. For example more apps and other things are being produced because of the effect cultural imperialism has had on Apple products. Cultural imperialism not only unites people, but it also allows many people to innovate and interact in ways that were never seen before.
    Cultural identity of any county can be preserved through the countries own actions. If they promote a certain image of their society and culture they will not have an issue with other societies working against their own. They can also make an effort to integrate American products into their society so that both the American and other countries societies blend together. Countries should also promote independent business as well as chains because this will give the country its own signature product. If there were more small businesses there would be more competition and more choice which would lead to a greatly diverse society that is a mix of many cultures.
38. Emily Bice February 6, 2012 at 7:07 pm

    1. There can be an upside to cultural imperialism. While cultural imperialism might be stealth marketing, or may be ethically wrong at times, it also has benefits. In the article it said how Starbucks created the idea of community; although people are going there to buy a coffee, they also now have a commonplace to come together, a haven of sorts. Cultural Imperialism in Starbucks helps to instill the feeling of community in a world that many thought would be lost to technology and the 21st century. The upside to cultural imperialism is that it can help create values and ideas in countries and cities worldwide. Also, cultural imperialism can bring resources to countries that they might not have had before. As unhealthy as MacDonald’s is, it allows impoverished areas to get food that they might not be able to afford.
    2. I think that there are numerous ways that other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer. They can allow the ideas brought over from American corporations to influence them but should allow themselves to put their own culture into it. For instance, a Starbucks in America might serve a Christmas latte; a Starbucks in Israel might adopt a Hanukkah latte. I don’t think that there is anything wrong with bringing American ideas to other countries. However, I do agree that the way we go about it is wrong. Is it really necessary to duplicate American culture and place it all around the world? The answer is simple: no. An example of how we shouldn’t imperialize is MacDonald’s. MacDonald’s has done exactly what cultural imperialism is, and it’s awful. While they do allow impoverished areas cheap food, they also make them unhealthier and inflict the American overweight stigma on other cultures, something that should not happen. Companies should work harder to not imperialize culturally on other cultures.
39. Alex Lurz February 6, 2012 at 7:08 pm

    1. In my opinion cultural imperialism definitely has a lot of up-side. In a way it ties all sorts of cultures together, and almost gives the world a sense of unity. An example of this is when I went to Paris over winter break there were a few American chains spread throughout the city, and while in some ways it was bothersome to see these restaurants, at the same time it was almost a little bit comforting. Also, if a company from the states wants to try its luck across the pond they should have every right to do that, and obviously if they are still in business then they are doing something right. Another issue that needs to be discussed is one concerning the economy of the chains new location. Some people may make the argument that these American “monopolies” will put local businesses under, but in reality that is highly unlikely and there is a much higher chance that these companies will actually create jobs. The final thing that was mentioned in the reading was the issue of kids being essentially walking advertisements, and I think that this argument is not a very good one. Everyone knows that Nike products are more expensive than Fubu, and that is for a reason. Nike has been known to be with the times, and has always seemed to produce the best looking, most technologically advanced, and most comfortable product. If Fubu produced the better product, then kids would be walking around in Fubu gear instead of Nike.
    2. 2. I think that an easy way for foreign countries to maintain their own identity without being overwhelmed by the “American Consumer Tsunami” would be to have districts in their cities that would act as a center for foreign goods. The closest example to this that I can think of is China Town in New York. If you’ve never been to China town, it is essentially a Chinese gathering ground in New York. Despite the obvious cultural differences between this area and the rest of the city, New York will still be New York, and just because an area is infested with different ideas and cultures does not mean that New York City is considered to be any less of an American city. I understand that this example is a little extreme, but it would not do anything to spoil any of the foreign cultures, but at the same time give the consumers in that country a greater choice as the buyer.
40. Kurt Melendy - 3rd Hour February 6, 2012 at 7:15 pm

    1. I think that there can be an up-side to imperialism because, when more adapted countries take over the smaller countries that have not developed to the fullest, they can share their culture with them and make them feel more at home with the new technologies and skills that they can learn. It is sometimes nice to know that there are public places nearby, such as Starbucks, that you can go to and stay there to feel almost safe since there is usually a small population there. If schools are actually starting to run low on money then, I don’t think that it is a terrible idea to get companies to sponsor your school and in return, wear their logo on a school shirt. Some people want the logo of some recognizable company on their clothing and if they want that, then they can pay a little extra cash to get that. Most people who can afford to buy this kind of clothing, are usually pretty wealthy and probably wouldn’t mind spending a little extra cash for a certain logo on their clothing.

    2. I think that countries can preserve their own culture and identity by moving to a remote place where there is little to no people and practicing their culture there. If they really wanted their culture to continue on, then they could open some kind of building that is dedicated to their religion and only people of that race and culture would be welcomed there. As long as these other cultures don’t interfere with the American life style and disrupt peace amongst people, then they should be able to do whatever they want to do. If people want to continue their culture, then they should be able to continue it without being disturbed by other cultures and people who may be against them.
41. Claire Weber February 6, 2012 at 7:33 pm

    1: There can be an up-side to cultural imperialism because of the technological advances and the social benefits. America as well as other countries have gotten so far with technology that it would have been highly doubted in the early 1900’s. These advances have made our country stronger and more connected because we are able to communicate with different people, forming new relationships and a tighter bond. Social benefits have also been made because brands can tell who is knows what is in fashion and who can afford it. This sometimes causes racial and social problems but we have to remember that no matter how hard we try; racism and bullying will always be there. The best way to prevent this is to try our hardest to show everyone that bullying doesn’t do anything or get you anywhere. With that attitude, there is a better chance of everyone uniting together. Cultural Imperialism is the world’s greatest asset as well as our worst. What people should learn, is how to handle it.

    2: The best way to reinforce your culture is to keep you and your family up to date with the world, but at the same time, remind your children and friends that culture is most important. I find that the foreign families who stay with their culture and never buy brand clothing, end up behind the world because they haven’t moved on. The world is all about change and it is important that everyone tries to follow the change in hope of making things better. For some people, religion keeps them together so they are able to go to church, pray, and do other religious things. Although we want more people to stay with their culture in hope of stopping cultural imperialism, it will be impossible because different people have different situations and not every person has the same views, morals, or ways of living.
42. Ayah K. February 6, 2012 at 7:35 pm

    1) There can be many up-sides to cultural imperialism. Through cultural imperialism countries will be able to learn about one another’s cultures and practices, the economy will rise (trade), and life for travelers will be much easier. One cannot expect a country on the other side of the world to know about his/her culture if none of it is present in that country; however by using cultural imperialism that can change. Both the country and its citizens will be surrounded by their own culture, but also another country’s culture, thus creating cultural diversity in the country. Cultural imperialism may even have a chance of ending international hate, and breeding world peace. By using cultural imperialism countries will be given an opportunity to increase their economy through trade, etc. Instead of depending on domestic trade between cities from the same country, countries will be able to export and import their goods internationally.
    2) It would be fairly easy for other countries to preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami. It’s not like the United States would annex the countries, no, we would just help both ourselves and the people of that country expand their cultural knowledge, increase their economy, etc. Creating a balance between the countries’ original culture and our new culture is totally possible. The United States would just have to make sure that we wouldn’t pressure or force the country to allow us to insert our culture into theirs. If we do, it would seem as if we are actually annexing that country instead of just adding our culture to it. A possible solution to allowing a country to preserve their own culture and identity while still imputing our culture would be to retain the amount of culture previously present and only slightly increase our culture and identity.
43. Weston Blum February 6, 2012 at 7:36 pm

    1. There definitely can be an upside to cultural imperialism. The main upside is that influences and cultures can be extended in a positive fashion. If cultural imperialism did not exist, culture would be, in my professional opinion, boring. Music would be dull, when an instrument would be invented, only people in that country would know about it. How weird would it be if the only music that Americans knew was tribal drumming with ceremonial shouting? Very much so, that’s how weird it would be. Also, how strange would society be if we did not any other cultures foods? Cuisine would also be dull. American food would just be creamed corn and wheat. Which, not trying to knock creamed corn and shredded wheat, is not quite as exciting as current worldwide cuisine. The influence of one country/empire on another is very great, and often positive. So, cultural imperialism also helps people get cheap food, which everybody loves!

    2. Others countries can preserve their own cultures and identity without being overwhelmed by the Americans by strengthening their cultural bonds. It is much harder for persistent Americans to break the bonds of culture if they are much wider and stronger. American businessman and marketers try so very hard to destroy other countries senses of culture by thrusting our own culture on theirs. But, the harder it is, the less likely it is that they will keep trying. If Americans can still build their KFC’s while New Delhi stills keeps its own culture and cuisine, there is practically no harm to anyone. Some people might disagree with that statement, but there is no real reason why foreign culture and capitalist businesses cannot coexist. Sometimes other Americans try to hide their power with some sort of guise pretending to be some sort of true ethnic cuisine (that’s right, I’m calling you out, Baja Fresh), but with some sneaky business, Americans could also convince people of the world that they are not actually destroying their culture little by little until all that is left is a lone golden arch. But, that’s our little secret.
44. Rennie P. February 6, 2012 at 7:49 pm

    1. There is no logical advantage to cultural imperialism. Sure, some will argue that this will “unite” human beings in some way because we can all relate to each other in some way. I disagree with this statement. The very idea rooted in imperialism is that we are superior to all other countries. So, when we do things like spread our businesses and shows like The Real World, all we do is take away potential business from foreign countries. This clearly destroys business equality or just equality in general. In the essay mentioned, the author herself even notes that cultural imperialism wipes out cultures that vary around the world. Losing cultural influences from cultures such as ours obviously doesn’t have an advantage. If I go to Spain, it’s not going to comfort me to see a Starbucks or a Walmart. I would actually be pretty upset that my cultural experience actually turned out to be a trip that would be the same as if I had went a mile away from my house.

    2. Countries clearly can’t preserve their culture with American takeover. This is another reason why cultural imperialism causes inequality. It’s pretty obvious that America is the hegemon, so countries are naturally afraid of us. Which means they have little desire to tell us to stop giving them money and implementing our own businesses. The “American Tsunami” is overwhelming and impossible to refute. So, cultures are wiped out. However, America doesn’t and won’t care. Cultural imperialism is structured around power and capitalism; what America does best.
45. Bridget February 6, 2012 at 7:59 pm

    1) While I do believe cultural imperialism kind of diminishes the cultures and varieties of them, there are, in fact, some up sides to it. One advantage of cultural imperialism is the fact that two complete strangers from any given developed country, despite a plethora of cultural and language barriers, can connect on something as trivial as the show teen moms, or even a favorite brand. It never ceases to amaze me, and I think it’s a stepping stone to greater things. Another gain is that it’s comforting (in a sick and twisted way, no less) that if I were to go to Italy and not know anyone, there would at least be the familiarity of a Big Mac waiting for me there…Tragic, I know…Who eats McDonald’s in Italy?? Also, it’s good from a business perspective…But at what price will all of these things get accomplished? I feel like there must be better ways to unify the countries or whatever…

    2) Although a seemingly daunting task, there are many ways of going about preserving ones’ culture. I mean, people could invest a bit more in their local businesses…And I don’t necessarily believe that what you purchase makes you what you are…I feel like as long as someone keeps in touch with who they are and where they came from, then maintaining tradition and whatnot will become easier. But maybe more restrictions and more mega-businesses are what’s vital for other countries to preserve their own cultures, but I also couldn’t see other countries taking too kindly to that, and doing so would maybe even ignite a trade war…The best possible way I can see protection of these cultures happening is through individual maintenance, meaning that people should take it upon themselves to keep the culture alive.
46. Renata B February 6, 2012 at 7:59 pm

    1. I believe that cultural imperialism does give some benefits to both sides of the equation. However, I also believe that it is the Americans that get the most out of it. By letting our big corporations run wild in many different countries, we throw out many small, native businesses just because they can’t compete with a giant company like that. With more and more native businesses being thrown by the wayside, America is slowly taking over all of their economies, one store at a time. Sure, it might make things slightly more convenient for some people, but all we’re doing is shipping over our unhealthy lifestyle to these people. That’s why, in the long run, I don’t think all of the other countries will benefit much from what we’re doing to their economy.

    2. I think the only way other countries can preserve their culture and identity and protect themselves from the American tsunami would be to make their own large companies and to push them over into America. With multiple large corporations running about, they would be able to compete with each other more. Also, who knows? Maybe people will find their new favorite business that’s not ran by us Americans. Other ways to protect their cultural identity is to make more tourist areas have locally ran businesses. Some of this preservation is going to have to come from us Americans, though. Tourists are going to have to be willing to try new things and be willing to support a good business even if it isn’t ran by us. Plus, we get enough of that stuff at home. It may take a long while, but we are still able to preserve all of those different cultures that we are in the process of changing. It’s our job to make sure that only the good changes get through.
47. Sarah H. 2nd hour February 6, 2012 at 8:02 pm

    1. I think there can be an upside to cultural imperialism, because if people around the world enjoy brands like Starbuck’s or McDonalds then they should have access to it. It might even help unite people by giving them something they have in common. That way when people travel a familiar sight might make them a little less homesick. I do believe that by bombarding other countries with American culture it makes it harder for countries to stay true to their own cultures. If they are to distracted by outside cultures a people may neglect develop, and modernize their own. Then it would go out of fashion quickly and American culture would rule. I think this would be very bad because if everyone stalks the same celebrities, listens to the same music, and eats the same food then there will no longer be any diversity in the world, and people would start to lose sight of who they really are. If that happened then there would be no point in traveling at all.
    2. I think that really it is up to the people of a culture to decide whether they will create their own unique culture or if they will be swept up by the tsunami. (I like the metaphor)The people can ultimately decide if it is trendier to Americanize oneself or stay true to ones original culture. I realize that the media probably also has an influence on this but if a country limits the amount of propaganda supporting American ways that the people will be able to preserve their identities. Also if local businesses are popular enough to compete with American businesses then that would put a more local (not American) touch on the products that people buy and wear. But if the American businesses create monopolies in other countries then those people are practically forced to Americanize themselves.
48. Julie Furton February 6, 2012 at 8:06 pm

    1. Yes, there can be an upside to cultural imperialism and that is that the companies like McDonalds and Starbucks are thriving which in turn helps all economies involved and provides jobs. The economy is down here in America and by spreading our business worldwide, our country, along with others can gain and this can help rebuild our economy. Also, when McDonalds starts to pop up in almost every country, then it’s no longer the American culture taking over, it’s everyone’s culture so the cultural imperialism turns into a worldwide habit which can unite us all. Cultural imperialism when countries take over another that doesn’t want to be taken over is bad, but when the country is welcoming the change, as many countries have welcomed McDonalds, then that form of cultural imperialism is good.
    2. The countries can easily refuse to accept our American businesses into their countries as a way to preserve their culture. The American companies such as McDonalds and Starbucks are most likely replacing restaurants where ever they go and by not allowing them in, then the older restaurants can thrive and not have to close. It seems in this article as if the American companies such as McDonalds and Starbucks are ruining cultures and that the countries they are not located in don’t want this. In my opinion, if the countries didn’t want these new companies and wanted to preserve their couture, then they either wouldn’t let them in to the country or wouldn’t buy from them. I’m sure the sales are just as great because McDonalds is McDonalds and if not it probably would have been closed by now. Also, we shouldn’t be blaming the companies for destroying culture, blame the consumers who reject their culture for somebody else’s. It’s not that we are invading on everybody else’s culture; it is that everyone wants ours, so we give it to them.
49. Marie Portes February 6, 2012 at 8:06 pm

    1. Cultural imperialism can have a good side because it ties all differents parts of the world together. It gives a thread of similarity between countries because, from a china to europe to america, mcdonalds is a household name. This helps form common ground, keep countries from alienating themselves, and, in a sense, endears countries to each other. Cultural imperialism as we know it, however, is primarly american and the products are coming from america, this is unfortunate because though our economy and sense of pride inflates, other countries begin to see us as threatening and invading. If the share and distribution of brand from different countries was more equal and stable, america would benefit from it as being introduced to another culture and another way of life without leaving your neighboorhood can allow someone to beome much more open minded without America loosing the benefits of having such a vast cultural spread.
    2. I think other countries may find it very hard to not be overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami. Being from another country, I know how much American culture is imbranded into foreign culture, whether it be brands, shops, fast food, tv, singers. In fact from all 400 french tv channels, i’d say less than 10% of the shows on tv in France are, in fact, native to the country. The same (if not more) applies to music and clothing. However, I would not say America is benefiting to much from this. Though many are in great admiration of the “american dream” and “american lifestyle”, in order to not be overwhelmed, many countries, instead of finding ties by similarities, find ties by joining together at the threat of a country as overpowering as the United States. For example, many may ridicule the American commerce, though still buying th clothes, simply because of the price tag. Many find common ground in critizing and mocking America. This fear of their culture being squashed by America’s spreading their culture is causing a lot of resentment in many countries. That is how other countries have managed to preseverve their identity, it is not rare at all, in France to hear someone say: “Americans are just so cheap and ignorant and fat” while walking out of a gap store, that same person however will be sporting other luxurious french items to make up for that. It is very confusing but really, this expansion can be very detrimental to the world’s opinion on the US.
50. Johnny R. February 6, 2012 at 8:17 pm

    1. I think cultural does have some up sides. One would be the fact the all the countries get to see how other cultures live. I think this is good because that people should be educated on different cultures so you’re not subjected to knowing about just one culture. People in my opinion like to be these so called “walking billboards’ because it feels good. Some people want others to know what they are wearing because they are proud of it and want to show it off. Also cultural imperialism creates money for foreign countries which is good for the developing countries. In my opinion I guess it would be nice to see a chain restaurant like McDonalds or Starbucks in another country because I know that is creating jobs for the workers of that country and also is generating some money. The bad side to it though is that if too much of this keeps happening then we won’t have the little stuff that makes each and every one of us unique.
    2. I think other countries need to limit the amount of expansion of these big time corporations. I think a little is good but I don’t want to see these chain stores all over foreign countries because then all the native people will shop there because they want to “fit in with the Americans”. These countries need to make some sort of regulations that can limit the amount of these stores that could be coming to these countries and taking over. While it is good that we are trying to make things that everyone in the world can relate to, I like people having their own style. I think this is what keeps the world going is the contrasting differences of people that make different parts of this world unique.