110 thoughts on “Blog #31 – Cultural Imperialism”

1. Kevin Berkowitz February 6, 2012 at 8:21 pm

   1. Yes I do think there is an upside to cultural imperialism. The upside to cultural imperialism is that it helps connect different countries or regions through the products they make. It is a way for people to become closer together. When going to a foreign country if you are not the adventurous type and you want something to eat you could probably find a McDonald’s. Me personally I don’t understand why you just wouldn’t eat the local cuisine, but for some people they enjoy having that reassuring feeling that even though they are not at home they still have some part of home with them. I understand how some people could see it as a downfall by not supporting the local places, but with a franchise you will always have confidence in it. You know that when you go in to that specific place it will be what you want. You will not have to worry about something being wrong. In this way the world is connected in more ways than one person realizes. This will make the world stronger because we are connecting the different parts of it.

   2. Other countries can preserve their culture by making an appealing product like the franchise. They could make something similar to it that would also cause consumer interest. A second way although this would not be the most beneficial is to combine with the franchise. If they were to make a place that combined both the franchise and the countries culture people would be more inclined to go in because it is something they know. By combining with a franchise they could only have a small part of it the franchise and the rest of it the local place. People will be more inclined to come in because it’s something they know. Because of that if they are in that place they will most likely see something else they want from the specific regions product. They would see this because they went to the place they knew.
2. Caitlyn Dolan February 6, 2012 at 8:22 pm

   1. Yes, I believe that there is definitely an upside to cultural imperialism, although the negative aspects of cultural imperialism may outweigh the positive ones. The positive results of cultural imperialism are equality, value, and simplicity. Cultural imperialism allows different cultures access to products of equal craftsmanship as those of other countries. It opens up options for business and advertisement all over the place. Not only does cultural imperialism allow for more equal market, it also brings people together. When they are shopping for the same product and like the same things, people can relate to one another. Kids in America can connect with kids in other countries through their mutual love of MTV, or dislike of McDonald’s fries. In addition, cultural imperialism raises standards in other countries, increasing product quality and value. When all of a company’s goods are made by a reputable source, no matter where the product is sent, the product is made and will hold up well. Finally, cultural imperialism simplifies things immensely. It creates a less difficult market with fewer options for competition, meaning that consumers have and easier choice of what to buy. Cultural imperialism can also simplify relationships between countries because it opens an accessible door for trade and connections.
   2. Other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American “consumer tsunami”, though it isn’t easy. The American consumer tsunami is a result of quality products created cheaply, and then stamped and sent to other countries as advertisement and export. Although American companies often do a cookie cutter “individuality” for each country that they send their products to, other countries still have to let their own culture and identity shine through. Other countries can do this by trying to balance their market with products made in their own country and by taking American products and de-Americanizing them. For instance, other countries can cater to their own style of cell phone by taking the concept of the iPhone and morphing it into something that is the most suitable for its consumers, as opposed to just selling the American iPhone in stores.
3. Jeffrey Couger February 6, 2012 at 8:22 pm

   1. There is absolutely no reason to disapprove of cultural imperialism because of the mass benefits that may not seem directly apparent. Those that apply; on the contrary, Globalization promotes the understanding of different cultures and doesn’t limit them, and second; Cultural Imperialism stands behind world peace. America is not the only country that participates in globalization. Our country is Living evidence that this is true. The United States is a melting pot- of many different cultures. We see this everyday with the use of foreign cars on our streets, authentic foreign restaurants, and popular culture references to foreign media. We(The American People) would have a minimal understanding of international culture if it weren’t for cultural imperialism and the same can be said for the smaller countries that we are so called “forcing” our culture upon. If it weren’t for US development in those places they would have a lack of understanding on the basis of which is American Culture. Next, Cultural Imperialism is essential in promoting world peace. As countries are introduced to other countries culture they grow reliance upon them. Once again, we can draw modern cultural parallels to stand behind this statement. People in the US would be driven mad with the idea of not being able to drink their daily Star Bucks. There is nothing leading us to believe that people in other countries don’t gain a reliance on our products either- implying that they would feel the same way with a lack of Star Bucks. If two countries went to war, trade would end, causing chaos upon the people who have gained a reliance on specific products- preventing the warfare itself. The people would not stand for not receiving the essentials that have for so long been part of their everyday lives. Cultural Imperialism has endless benefits, and although not always deciphered at first glance we would be thrown into chaos without it- through the lack of cultural understanding and warfare.

   2. Other countries can preserve their own cultural identity the same way we do. We embrace and understand other culture, without throwing away our own, which is empirically proven. If people are not forced to completely change, they won’t. That doesn’t mean they won’t embrace American culture, but it also means that they won’t lay down their own in less they’re willing. Cultural Imperialism is different from general Imperialism through warfare in that it isn’t forced, so there is no reason to believe that the smaller countries will lie down and assimilate.
4. Brad D. 1st Hour February 6, 2012 at 8:31 pm

   1. I think there can be an upside to cultural imperialism but personally I believe the downsides outweigh the upsides and I don’t believe cultural imperialism is a good thing. The cultures around the world are so unique and different and define a country. Chains like Starbucks and McDonalds opening stores around the world really take away what makes that country unique in a way. If Starbucks puts a store on every street corner in Paris what makes classic coffee shops that almost define France stand out. I do think that taking things from other cultures like food, drink or religion can be good for a culture but a culture and a country need to have something that defines them and that they can call their own.
   2. I think there a lot of ways countries can preserve their own cultures and not be influenced by American culture so much. People in America are saying “buy American” and support America by buying things that were made in America or support companies that are based in America. I don’t think that we are where we want to be with keeping jobs in America or buying American goods but we can lead by example with our push to buy American goods and have other cultures and countries support things within their own cultures like eating at a restaurant that serves that cultures food and avoiding the American McDonalds down the street. You also don’t really see other countries advertising their cultures in America except for maybe car companies. Other countries could do more to promote their own cultures. Personally I would love to see a restaurant chain from like France or Spain open in Beverly Hills. I know I would try it and I think other people would to and that would sort of counter act the super influential American culture.
5. Rachel Steffes February 6, 2012 at 8:35 pm

   To answer question one, I think there is a possible upside to cultural imperialism. The idea of soliciting the same products across the global allows society to come together and have something in common; the chasm between the “haves” and the “have-nots” has a little bit less of an impact. If everyone was able to have the same products, everyone would have something – one thing even – similar. Although trying not to edge on the boundaries of fascism, everyone should also continue to believe what they believe and think what they think. On a more local level, when watching Morgan Spurlock’s “The Greatest Movie Ever Sold” a couple weeks ago, it talked about how schools are allowing companies to advertise on their property for extra money since the school districts couldn’t afford it (a major sponsor was Pom juice). It discussed how one school was even having companies advertising on the fences lining the roads because they need extra cash. Another (less impactful) upside to cultural imperialism happens when companies advertise at schools. Schools should only allow healthy, safe, and legal companies to advertise, like Pom drink. For the trailer:
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4Ng2P3zxfM

   To answer question two, I think a policy needs to be made that limits American advertisement in other countries. This would allow countries to allow their own companies to advertise there without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami. In addition, I think companies that do advertise in other countries should be required to donate part of the percentage of their earnings to help the country’s individuals in poverty. This would allow the money to keep being worked through a cycle, instead of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. This would be based on the companies amount of advertising in the country and how much profit is made each year.
6. Kian Soleimani February 6, 2012 at 8:48 pm

   1. Yes I think that there can be an upside to cultural imperialism for several reasons, one of those reasons is to expand a good cause to other cultures. For an example if you were protester for recycling and saving energy. That is an upside to imperialism because you are only spreading what’s good. However, in some cases people might find that too much good in ones atmosphere can be overwhelming or irritating. An example of that would be animal protection posters in a church. That might be considered annoying to some people as it is interfering with their religious practices. The main idea of imperialism was thought as the right thing to do. Teddy Roosevelt thought that it was a good idea as many of his policies were built on imperialism’s foundation. But throughout modern times the use of imperialism has definitely been overwhelming to other cultures like the article said there are over 31,000 McDonalds restraints in 118 countries, I don’t know about you but that might seem a little irritating if I were in another country. The article also talked about how MTV is in so many countries that every morning there are thousands of households watching MTV around the world. You can basically say that we are Americanizing the world.

   2. For countries with this overwhelm there are most defiantly many things that can be done. For example, the government can put limits on the number of restaurants like “McDonalds.” But all of this is also up to the people. Maybe some people like to be overwhelmed by American culture, and when a situation like that comes, it would be a good time to vote. but like I said laws and policies can always be passed depending on weather the country is under a democracy or communism. In conclusion imperialism is simply a way of expanding ones culture ideas to other countries.
7. Dominic Gutierrez February 6, 2012 at 9:03 pm

   1. Can there be an up-side to cultural imperialism? If so, what is it and why? If not, why not?

   There can be an up-side to cultural imperialism because if you’re in a different country and you don’t want the local food or you don’t know where anything is sometimes nice to see an American restaurant or a store that is by you at home. Even if you are trying to see a new experiences it comforts you that you can almost feel like you’re at home but in a complete different country. Also when you see people in other countries wearing American brands it kind of gives you another homey feeling that they know what’s up. But some times that can also destroy the cultural influences that that country has thrived on if they don’t want American made thing there or want a little, but still want their own that fine as well. Americans can’t tack ever thing away from different countries.

   2. How do you think other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami (metaphor, work with me, o.k.?)?

   I feel like sometimes we as American want to push other countries cultures and identity’s out of the way and be more like us, but they should be able to preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by American consumer tsunami because we’re not there country they can do whatever they want. If they want to buy and make American made products they can do so which is very good, but we shouldn’t jam it down there throats. It nice to see other countries bring their stuff to America but they don’t put it up everywhere (maybe) but we can all expect each other present evenly and it will be a better world experiences if this happens.
8. Sam Yost February 6, 2012 at 9:03 pm

   1. There can definitely be an upside to cultural imperialism. Spreading your products around the world exposes people to new cultures. It opens your mind to all the differences in the world. It also connects you to people in different countries. Even if you live in completely different places, you might all have the same love of Starbucks, for example. Cultural imperialism also helps your country financially. It is a way of showing off your country to people who might not know that much about it. It attracts tourists, and spreads your products worldwide. Cultural imperialism isn’t all good, though. If you are spreading bad products, people will think poorly of your country. You also don’t want to force your products into a different culture. The point is increasing diversity and not trying to convert them completely. On the whole, cultural imperialism is good, if used correctly.

   2. Other countries can preserve their culture by limiting their purchases of foreign goods. If people of a different culture only bought their own products, there would be no profit for big American companies. You would also be putting a lot of money into your own companies. It is impossible to completely stop buying from big American companies, but just a little limitation will go a long way. Laws can be passed that tell big companies what they can and cannot do. For example, they could put a limit on the number of stores in a certain area. You can also preserve your culture by fighting back. Promoting your own products might counter the bigger American companies. You can’t just create a super-company like McDonalds overnight, but if everybody did a little to promote their own companies, the super-companies would have a tougher time taking over. Choosing to buy more of your countries own products and less super-company products is all it takes to stop the tsunami.
9. Kenneth Johnson February 6, 2012 at 9:10 pm

   1.) I do believe that there can be a upside to cultural imperialism, if I were to go to a foreign country I wouldnt want to not know a single things that this countrys people are saying or doing. So the benefits of cultural imperialism is that in some way it brings all types of people together to connectwitheach other, it also helps builds other peoples knowledge of other countries background and origins rather than just their own. BUT wherever there is good,bad always seem to follow ,there are some disadvantages of cultural imperialism such big nations trying to take over a small powerless country such as when the european nations tried to colonize the latin countries but the roosevelt corollary handled that situations .But in conclusion some people may think that cultural imperialism is all bad but in the long run some people really need cultural imperialization to survive and fit in to foreign countries.

   2.) Some of the ways how I think that countries can preserve their culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the America Cinsumer Tsunamis is by having self disipline and not huying american products and instead of building up their empire make their own billion dollar corporations and franchises, and when they do this they get the rep of being a independent powerhouse. But if this starts to happen all the countries will be minding their own business and their will be less world trade for consumer products. These are some of my personal tips for countries who want to be independent and not be sucked into Americas Consumer Tsunami.
10. Emily L February 6, 2012 at 9:11 pm

    1. Can there be an up-side to cultural imperialism? If so, what is it and why? If not, why not?
    Yes, cultural imperialism can help us learn about other cultures. It can also give us shared experiences that can help us relate to people who were raised in different locations. It can also lead to new exports of American products. However it can be taken so far that you ruin or block out the native culture. Often this disrupts the lively hood of the area and can lead to discontentment. Also if you import immoral ideas or ideas that are against the lifestyle of the area, it can lead to family strife and discontentment that will be mentally harmful for the participants. Many cultures still value family more than ours which is based mostly on temporal greed. This as far as I can see has not lead to happiness in our society and it would not be a kind thing to give to other countries.
    2. How do you think other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami (metaphor, work with me, o.k.?)?
    They can place regulations of American businesses, such as restrict their advertisement and buildings to certain parts of cities. They can regulate how big companies can be in their countries to help prevent monopolies forming in the country. All products that we sell to the country can be approved by groups so that they will most fit the culture already existing. Such as instead of incurraging people to not learn how to cook and just buy McDonalds, we could sell American recipe books (that don’t used processed ingredients) and pots, ovens, and pressure cookers so that we share some of our culture without over righting their own and let them experience new things. Instead of selling clothing that would be considered scandalous by the culture and incurraging their youth to fall away from their parents beliefs, you could uphold standards just with more western style cloths. They could also have free classes given on cultural skills. We don’t really need this because we were a hodge podge nation to begin with. A nation made up of nations.
11. Daniel Poberesky February 6, 2012 at 9:14 pm

    1.I think there’s an up-side to cultural imperialism. It is only beneficial to share points of view, cultural and moral values, and merchandise, spread different or new ideas to other countries. Third World countries especially benefit from learning and getting technology, food, and brands from Western countries. To some authoritarian countries, the spread of ideas of freedom of expression, democracy, equality, and human rights through the media may have a great influence on general population views and development, and I am positive that this is a great up-side since these beliefs are considered to be universal. American ideals of equality, freedom, and democracy now available in the world may give more freedom to women, children, and to minorities in all cultures, and will promote anti-racist, anti-sexist or anti-authoritarian messages and regimes.

    2.In my opinion, the first and most important thing for the citizens of other countries is to keep their own language, culture, and traditions. As English becomes a global language, and language of choice in international communications, the influence of American culture becomes overwhelming for other countries. Keeping your own language enables citizens to preserve traditions specific to their country, learn their history from original sources. Other things can be done are developing their own brands; instead of Coca-Cola, Starbucks, or cartoon characters familiar to general public of the country – instead of Mickey Mouse or Spider-Man. Building and developing factories that will produce cars, or leather – that can be later used as a trade with other countries, and making this country known by the whole world for that specific brand or model. Since the majority of the US population are Christians, and many Christian ideas and values are spread to the other countries, observing countries own religious traditions and holidays also help to preserve this country’s identity. Education is an important part of national identity as well – learning about your own country can make the citizen proud of his or her own country.
12. Brian Jelinek February 6, 2012 at 9:18 pm

    Yes, I really do think that there is an upside to social imperialism because if I was walking around a foreign country and didn’t know a lick of what the people were saying, I would walk into that Starbucks or McDonalds and ask the workers there who speak English where to go and where everything is. Also it is good to have American Companies outside of America (not too much) but a good amount to have so it can bring in more money to companies that are based in the United States. Included in the articles I am also not seeing a huge deal with companies making their shirts and cloth graphic with their logos on them. I wear name brand cloths and all of those cloths have the company logo on them. I am really not seeing a big deal with that. I guess that people want to keep up with the latest trends and also have that nice name brand on their bodies.
    The way for local and national companies to not get overwhelmed by the “American tsunami” would be to start making their own international giant chain companies themselves. What countries should do is make giant companies that can compete with Starbucks or McDonalds, or even the various beer companies of the United States. If Canada or the Netherlands were to start mass producing their beer companies (even though the already do) such as Labatt, or Heineken where they could set up many breweries in the United States and try to set up as many distributor locations as possible they could try to balance out what America is trying to do. On the other hand it is always also to have that small local business. If other countries could just maintain a certain amount of local business that still give the same specialties such as burgers or coffee these local combines could stay afloat and also get good revenue.
13. Jackie Feist February 6, 2012 at 9:22 pm

    1. Yes, I think there can be, at least for the imperialist country by promoting their values and culture it creates a bigger, world-wide market for products and business. By spreading their culture around the world it advertises their goods and way of life for other countries especially third- world countries to see. It’s like the Super Bowl adds; companies pay 3.5 million dollars to air 30 seconds of commercial during the Super Bowl, that can be defined as imperialism. The companies impose their products and views on billions of viewers that tune in to see the Super Bowl, and as result they get more sales and money. Same with cultural imperialism when we impose our culture on other countries we are basically marketing our products and companies to them, which prompts trade and helps our economy grow. When countries trade and compete new technologies are invented that can benefit the world for decades to come. So I do think there is an up side, but when there is a winner there is always a loser, so there is definitely a down side as well I just don’t know what it is and if it’s outweighs the benefit.
    2. I think they can preserve their culture by marketing and enforcing their own culture to the younger generations that will determine the future of their country. Or they can limit the American influence on their nations people, like China. I don’t think that doing exactly what China is desirable or not but the small stuff can help. For example the KFC surge in China, the Chinese preserve their own culture by adding and adjusting the fast food. In China KFC fast food places add egg rolls and other foods of Chinese origin to the KFC menu that help maintain their culture and counteract the overwhelming popularity American food chains.
14. Mason Cavanaugh February 6, 2012 at 9:23 pm

    1.I believe there is an upside to cultural imperialism. I think that having our culture slightly integrated into others may benefit them. It gives them Companies and establishments that could make their society simpler. Many other countries want to be more modernized as well. And even if some don’t, it may be good for them. Over time they can realize what excitement and ease modern day America holds. I feel that this could also be a bad thing though. It would be awful to completely destroy a countries culture, by implementing American business. Imperialism turns bad when you start talking about destroying a culture or sweatshops. I believe that if you improve sweatshops to good working conditions, Imperialism is good and provides jobs. In short imperialism is helpful with balance. If you can limit complete takeover and just add a bit of American culture to the countries, it would be in a perfect balance.
    2.To stop complete imperial takeover, a country needs to deny monopolies. It is alright to have a few companies such as Burger king, or Starbucks, but when it comes to having a society that functions on these things; it’s not healthy for their culture. A country being imperialized, should partly accept some of the franchises and other change. Like I said before, a good blend of their own culture and some outside imperialist establishments can help a country function quite well. Many countries don’t have a strong power to stop extreme imperialism. The countries will simply allow it to happen, and take the jobs, not thinking about their values and culture being diminished. I think countries realize this, but they assume the inevitable. The country will see this gradually happen. Countries need to communicate if they wish to keep imperialism out of their county. The country needs to be strong and stand for what they want to keep their culture alive.
15. Stephen Brown February 6, 2012 at 9:25 pm

    Stephen Brown
    1. Can there be an up-side to cultural imperialism? If so, what is it and why? If not, why not?
    Yes, I believe that there is a silver lining to the steamrolling thundercloud of cultural imperialism. Humans are fickle and wussies, they may travel all around the world but we want our golden arches! By having familiar places around the world we can feel more at home. This also serves to let us ‘mericans feel superior to everyone else. Strictly speaking of American brand, seeing a starbucks in India would feed into our ego. As American we love our ego, by seeing this we think we are better. These things are superficially positive. There is an upside to imperialism, but it’s small compared to the drawbacks. The goal of every company is to become global, they won’t stop themselves when there is money to be had somewhere else. People outside, who don’t stand to gain anything, need to regulate them.
    2. How do you think other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami (metaphor, work with me, o.k.?)?
    They can’t, globalization is inevitable. The truth is, the only way to remain distinct is to isolate oneself. Think of it this way, the Native American people were a distinct culture and society in their own right. They had their own culture, beliefs and arms. After the Europeans landed and settled they changed the Natives. The change has been gradual, but sure. Now we have many people part Native American and even the full natives have been “globalized”. They still hold on to their old cultures, but not in the way they had before. When forward progress is made by a culture in close proximity to another, both cultures will end up with the same advancement. Agriculture, for example, the natives helped immigrants farm. BAM! Globalization. Any culture adopting another’s tools or products is being changed. Normally for the better, if this is a good or bad globalization has yet to be seen.
16. Mady February 6, 2012 at 9:27 pm

    1. I don’t think there can be an upside to cultural imperialism. We’re basically clones/slaves to the corporate world and promote whatever they want us to. Most athletes drink Gatorade, if you want to feel sophisticated you go to Starbucks, and there is a sickeningly high number of clothing that has “designer labels”. There are clothing sold by stores that could easily be bought at a better price, but no, it HAS to be Hollister. You could get a dollar coffee at McDonalds, but it has to be Starbucks. And even a McDonald’s coffee is from a powerful company. There’s nothing in today’s American society that isn’t from some big company or designer or food chain. Even on T.V. all you can see is these false reality shows and talk shows with sme celebrity. None of it is real, and none of it feels right either. Cultural imperialism would be a pretty bad thing, considering America’s bad habits and fake attitude shouldn’t be spread around.
    2. Other countries have a lot more history than America does. They have a lot more reason to preserve their culture and probably feel obligated not to give into American temptation. Countries like china and spain have been around for hundreds of years and most likely would rather preserve their own culture than act like Americans. Those other countries should remember their cultural values and even if they give into a few American Culture habits, they still need to preserve what’s old and what’s good. Other countries are a lot bigger than us, and have a lot more values and rich cultural things to preserve. We haven’t been around enough to really create a “Culture”, so spreading that “Culture” through cultural imperialism would probably just be a suggestion. Bigger, older countries would never give into American habits.
17. Bradley Taylor 3rd Hour February 6, 2012 at 9:30 pm

    1. There can be an up-side to cultural imperialism. I think so because first off, if a country expands its ideas on a weaker, developing country, then that weaker country can improve its schooling and advance its ideas that would in turn be better for its people. The only way this would work is that the imperialist country cannot be power hungry and demolish all of the cultures ideas in this new nation. If the imperialist nation helps the new nation, the new nation will share some of its culture, technology, and ideas that can even improve the imperialist country. So, the imperialists can hurt themselves if they just demolish all of the native’s culture, and ideas and give them all new ways because then the Imperialist will not gain anything new. Also, if the expansion is successful, other nations may want to join the imperialist country. Then, the new nation’s working conditions will still have to be the same as the imperialists’ because if they are terrible, then the cultural imperialism will look bad. So I think that there are good and bad sides to cultural Imperialism.
    2. I think other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by limiting the power of the new companies that expand to their nation and by keeping their own cultures intact. If the new country limits the power of the American companies like McDonald’s or Starbucks, then the country will be able to keep business with their own companies and their economy won’t be partly or mostly based on America. The other countries can do this by trying to expand their influence around the world with their companies. Also, the countries should keep their own cultures intact by not absorbing all American customs. It should be a ratio that is more in favor of their culture with some American culture blended in. If countries do this, they will most likely not be totally controlled by America.
18. Prof. Khalil Hall February 6, 2012 at 9:32 pm

    1.) I think that United States cultural imperialism definitely has its benefits. While it could be argued that companies like McDonalds and Starbucks are monopolizing the market, you have to recognize that the expansion of the industry is only possible if the services provided are popular. Just like Teddy Roosevelt’s “good trusts,” these large corporations are able to expand and spread the way they do because their products are popular; they make provide exceptional goods that people want to buy. People in other countries like to have the things that we have, so the cultural imperialism is welcomed in other countries. I think that if there is demand for goods and services that hail from the land of the free and the home of the whopper then there is absolutely nothing wrong with making it happen. Another to add may be that we benefit from the ever growing expansion of companies like McDonalds and Starbucks because they allow us to have a little piece of home wherever we may travel too. I know from personal experience that a little KFC in Ecuador never hurt anybody.

    2.) I could see how American cultural imperialism could pose a threat to the culture and identity of other countries. One seemingly obvious and abrasive solution could be for the governments of other countries to simply control the number of Americanized goods available to its citizens, or to ban them all together. This would technically prevent families in Ghana from sitting down to nice meal of double cheese burgers and French fries. It could also, however, prevent families from getting the double cheesy fried goodness that they WANT to be able to enjoy. While I do think cultural preservation is important, I think that change is inevitable, and if people want change in the form of Nike shoes and Starbucks mochas then that is what they deserve.
19. Jami Laub February 6, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    Cultural Imperialism can be a good and bad thing. For example cultural imperialism is good because people can fit it from all over the world, by having starbucks, Gap and other clothing stores from all over can bring us all together by having something in common that we all share. Seeing the same logo on your shirt that someone has from china is a cool thing to see which is why paying extra money for something that says “Juicy” or “Abercrombie” isn’t such a bad thing and if you don’t want to pay for that you can also buy clothing without logos. But logos are a good way that companies can sell there clothing because having a popular logo of a popular store makes everyone want to buy it. Also having several of types of clothing stores gives us a wide variety of options to choose from so we are not just limited to one type of coffee or one brand of clothing, which also creates competition between the stores but which ever one you like better that store is receiving your business.

    A way Countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the consumer tsunami is by creating products that only that country would know about or like as a specific style of their own country by creating smaller country businesses or smaller city businesses where those stores could still make a profit just they wouldn’t have a huge chain stores that is world wide it is just more conservative. They could also have alternative stores like ones we have in America so if something were to happen to one of those stores it wouldn’t be as big of deal because they would have their own similar stores. Also it could be better just in general to be able to have a more exclusive store.
20. Eric Scott February 6, 2012 at 9:42 pm

    1. There cannot be an upside to cultural Imperialism. Through imperialism people can lose their culture, and have to accept a new one. For a example if they tear down some restaurant in China then the people would be forced to eat McDonalds and couldn’t have the food that was at originally there. Also imperialism can take jobs because room has to be cleared for new businesses, and people. Also when companies like apple, and Sony make factories in other countries for cheap labor, they cause much distress, even to the point where people are committed suicide due to their working conditions. Imperialism can be bad if the country being taken over does not want to be taken over, the people of the land might try to rebel against the imperialist, or move away from their native country like the Cubans and Porto Rican’s did after America took over their country.
    2. I think that countries can preserve their culture buy mixing their culture and other culture imposed on them, for an example if they put a build a McDonalds in Japan they should try to serve regular McDonalds food like fries, and burgers but also some traditional Japanese food like ramen noodles, and chicken katsu. Also if a company wants to put stores in a certain country they company staff should learn the new language not the people they employee in the country. People can hold festivals, and other events like parades, and parties to celebrate their heritage and culture. If some countries don’t want their countries to be affected by imperialism they can fight back, and push for the independence of their country. They can preserve an area in a town and give its own rules like how to dress, and what language to speak , kind of like Chinatown.
21. Sophie Gamble - 3rd Hour February 6, 2012 at 9:47 pm

    1. I do not think there is an upside to cultural imperialism. In some cases, such as third world countries, it might be helpful to know about the cultures that are far away, but in other cases it’s not. Take McDonald’s for example, is it really necessary to have junk food all around the world? I would expect that every country has its own little chain of fast food restaurants, but McDonald’s survival as a company doesn’t depend on other countries. For clothing brands, it makes sense to charge less when something has a logo. I remember that in middle school it was popular to wear ‘Abercrombie’ across your shirt. It was advertising, and soon everyone had a sweatshirt that said a huge logo. Teens, children, even adults, are walking billboards for these companies.

    2. Other countries can preserve their own culture by not having all of these chain-businesses! Such as the ones mentioned in the article, there are many chain restaurants. When I was in Italy, there was a McDonald’s and it was completely empty. Then, when you looked around, all the local (and healthier) restaurants were packed with people. It not only helps their culture, but helps their own local economy. If people would buy local, they can preserve their own culture and not give into America’s charming ‘consumer tsunami’.
22. Stephanie Timmis February 6, 2012 at 9:56 pm

    1. There can be an upside to cultural imperialism. In different countries there are different customs, traditions, and social norms. In America, there are many different customs, traditions, and social norms combined into one country. In America, although it is not cultural imperialism, we do adopt many things from other countries. Our blended culture combines the best of all the people that make up this country. Therefore, cultural imperialism can be good in that it brings the best of one society to another one. It becomes a problem when one country’s customs are overthrown and overpowered by the imperialists’ customs.

    2. Other countries can maintain their own culture and identity and not be overwhelmed by American consumer tsunami by simply recognizing their own culture. If a country acknowledges their traditions and social norms, it will help instill a sense of importance and pride by their people in these customs. In America we blend all sorts of different cultures together so why cant they? What we do in America in order to maintain our own practices is, we have many holidays celebrating our achievements and our culture. Again, this is an example of how cultural imperialism is good; if other countries adopted America’s policy of celebrating our good, they would be able to maintain their own cultural identities.
23. Brendan Dwyer February 6, 2012 at 10:02 pm

    1.) Yes, in my opinion, there are many upsides to cultural imperialism. One example would be conformity. Cultural imperialism gives everyone around the world something to relate to. Companies like McDonald’s and Starbucks are all over the world, and if you visit another country with a Starbucks/McDonald’s in it, you can easily meet people who share interests with you. Liking the same type of food can easily spark up a conversation, and give someone comfort in an unusual place. Another benefit to cultural imperialism is that it could possibly attract people to our country, which, in turn, could help the economy. If companies like McDonald’s/Starbucks are liked by a lot of people in different countries, they might want to come to America to see what else we have to offer. Once they come to America, they will spend money, which will help boost our economy. Also, cultural imperialism can be beneficial because it will boost our economy alone. If people in other countries are buying products from American companies it will boost our economy, although it may not necessarily boost theirs. This is because if American products our bought, it will give American companies money, which, in turn, will give money to American workers and other citizens of America. This is good for us, but bad for other countries because we could possibly make foreign companies go bankrupt.

    2.) I think that other countries can help preserve their culture even with the “American consumer tsunami” by promoting products and other traditions in their country through commercials and other advertisements. If we can do it, why can’t other countries? I’m sure that most people in other countries would support their country by keeping their traditions and habits alive. Besides, only the fast food and chain companies imperialize other countries. I mean, you can only eat McDonald’s for so long before going back to your regular diet.
24. Maxie L. February 6, 2012 at 10:11 pm

    1. Yes, I would say that there is an up side to cultural imperialism in both America and foreign countries. I think that cultural imperialism makes it so people can recognize and depend on well know brands and food chains, which puts people in a stable comfort zone. People can rely on the fact that wherever they go in America or even foreign countries, that there will most likely be a McDonalds close by or a local Starbucks. These companies have made a major business move by gaining the trust of most of the population, which in return gives them great business and a constant expected income. In another aspect, I think that cultural imperialism is connecting the world as a whole. Due to the popular, well known brands and food chains being popularized in foreign countries, as well as America, people from all over have something they can relate to. People from different backgrounds and countries can easily recognize the same brands and companies, which makes cultural imperialism a positive thing because it sets a comfortable zone for all many different people.

    2. I think that other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer trends by setting a healthy balance of their culture and the American consumer trends that incoming tourists would be comfortable with. Most foreign countries already embrace their cultural identity well, but I think that the countries should have a 75% to 25% ratio of their culture (about 75%, they need to keep their ground) and the popular consumer trends (about 25%, because they are necessary for tourists visiting the area and people who are new to and uncomfortable with the area). Every country has to keep their unique culture, because if they adapted to the popular American consumer ‘trends’ too much, then they will all seem the same and loose their culture and identity, then our world would not be what it is today.
25. Piper S. February 6, 2012 at 10:14 pm

    1. I do believe there is an upside to everything even cultural imperialism. The upside is that other countries are being exposed to new things and are able to explore with some of the great American products. That is a good thing because it gives other countries a sense of what kinds of food they eat in different countries, or what people wear in America. This doesn’t mean that cultural imperialism is a great thing but it kind of gives people a sense of what it is like outside of their own country, considering they have never been outside of their country to see what it is like. When it comes to imperialism at home, I suppose that they should have brand-name stuff throughout the schools since the schools are underpaid, but it still seems wrong to advertise companies in a place for learning. So that makes another upside of cultural imperialism, money for schools. Money for schools is very important because schools are what set children on the path of their lives. Cultural imperialism is not that bad, it generates money but can be ethically wrong by using children to make that money.

    2. Other countries can preserve their identity and culture without being overwhelmed by the American consumer “tsunami”. They can preserve their culture by not letting the American companies take control of their nation. Other countries can keep their local companies booming with business while still keeping other American companies in business. So that other countries can still have the feel of other cultures from America but know that their country’s culture remains number one in their country. Also they can try to limit the amount of American stores/ places that are in their country, so the company does not become an even huger monopoly using their country. In summary, other countries can keep their culture and identity without being overwhelmed by just making sure the American products never come before the local products.
26. Justin Brink February 6, 2012 at 10:14 pm

    1. Yes, I believe that there is an upside to cultural Imperialism. It did destroy a lot of diversity around the world, but it gives everyone something to relate to. It’s cool that people from all around the world all eat or drink at the exact same places as we do. As good as this is to have anyone be able to relate to the same thing, it also has a bad side, because these big coorperations like McDonalds, Starbucks, Burger King, etc. are completely destroying smaller buisnesses tryinng to suceed. They don’t stand a chance, and the way were going , probably never will. In many countries today big fast food names are overtaking that countries culture and roots, and is a shame, because eventually, the way were going there will be no more culture.

    2. I think countries can preserve their culture without being overwhelmed by America’s big name companies by selling their own products, instead of promoting ours, this way their culture will be preserved in that country, and won’t be overrun by big coorperations. Even though the big named such as starbucks and McDonalds are spread out all over the world, I don’t think they will ever be able to completely take over and controll countries. As long as these countries start promoting and coming up with their own ideas for food or clothing that is “hip”, popular and new, then these countries will have nothing to worry about, and will easily be able to preserve their original culture.
27. Sarah Costello February 6, 2012 at 10:18 pm

    1. I think that there is definitely an upside to cultural imperialism. Visiting other countries can be very intimidating and a bit scary going somewhere completely different. Cultural imperiallism makes traveling to different countries a lot easier knowing that there are cultural ties back to America. It also unifies the country in a way. Teens from other countries can be found wearing the same clothes and using similar devices such as iPhones and iPods. The English language is spreading through these items and bringing a unified feeling to everyone. And for those people that have had job transfers to different countries and all they want is a connection back to America. It is helpful when familiar food is close by and be able to have a connection to back home. It may be harder for other countries to show off their culture but the more American influence that country has the more Americans are tempted to visit or vacation there because they have connections back to the U.S.
    2. I think that it is very important for each country to embrace their own culture and to have their own identity without being over whelmed by the American consumer tsunami. It is hard to do this when American culture is so easy to make money off of these days and is the more popular thing to buy, listen or watch American products. It is important for these countries to focus on their companies and try to encourage self promotion. Also they should not rely on American television shows and sitcoms for their entertainment; instead they should encourage more cultural television shows that show off their country more than American shows. It is important for that country to show off its talent and not have shows or radio programs that are all American made. It is important for countries to encourage themselves to be big and strong especially in their own country. It is hard when your culture is brushed aside in making way for a new American store. If the countries focus on creating big companies and encourage people to buy from those companies, then they will be able to stand up to American cultural imperialism.
28. Tessa Passarelli 4th hour February 6, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    1) Though cultural imperialism seems to be like a good thing, it’s actually a negative impact on todays society in all countries. People argue it’s “cool ” to have everyone wearing the same brands or drinking the same thing, it’s slowly dissolving cultures and traditions. People are making up a way for people from other cultures to relate. But once it’s a dominating chain that spreads across the world, like McDonalds, it stops being a thing in common and becomes a way of life. It destroys the diversity when everyone does the same thing. It destroys individuality throughout nations, because instead of incorporating their traditions or beliefs or ideas into chains for themselves, they allow stores like Starbucks to come and take over the coffee industry, Taco Bell and Burger King take over fast food, and so on. If I go to another country, I don’t go to buy Pizza Hut or Old Navy clothes- I go to experience their way of life and what stores and ideas they have, not mine. Cultural imperialism is basically destroying the individualism other countries have and making everything in the world one big melting pot of chain stores.

    2) I think other countries shouldn’t allow as many American chains into their country to preserve their own culture and identity from the American consumer tsunami. It’s nice for someone in a foreign country who might hate the food their to have something they know they like, but it shouldn’t be putting the countries own business in financial trouble. Countries should focus more on their culture and what they like instead of allowing in too much outside influence. That said, I’m not against cultures being totally separate. If we didn’t allow outside influence, we wouldn’t become better. But that doesn’t mean people should give up parts of their lifestyle so the people of the world can blend.
29. Oran Lieberman February 6, 2012 at 10:24 pm

    1) cultural imperialism can be beneficial under certain circumstances and guidelines. To start off, a circumstance needed for cultural imperialism to be in need would be a 3rd world country that is corrupt and lacks both the leadership and resources to better its nation. In this situation a first world country should be allowed to have its military enter the country only to MONITOR, not enforce policies that will prevent the out break of war. Also the first world country attempting this “rescue” mission would need to help create and fund projects aimed to better the government and quality of life in that specific country. Any non compliance with these rules should terminate the rescue program at task.

    2) the countries who are being attacked by the american tsunamis have multiple options to avoid bring completely overtaken by the Americans and their society. one option for one of these third world countries a would be to enforce their own military or militia. having their own form of defense would allow these countries to stay tough And not simply hand their rights over at will like they wert anticipated to do. Another way would be for the specific country to proceed with their own movements for rights and or against war.
    Sorry of there are any spellling our grammar issues, this was done on my cell phone
30. Kevin Dagenais February 6, 2012 at 10:37 pm

    1. Cultural imperialism does bring an upside to the world. This is because it brings the world together in one big family. However, it does destroy the diverse cultures throughout the world. People, especially teenagers want to fit in the society, such as having the same phone or wearing the same clothes, and cultural imperialism promotes that. For example: a company in America may invent a new phone that hasn’t been released in other countries, so cultural imperialism would make that people in countries like China want to have the same product. Again, this ends up tying up the country together. Cultural imperialism is beneficial because everyone in the world can relate to the same thing, such as eating the same food, buying the same product etc. Also, when you travel to foreign countries, people usually struggle to know where to eat or to sleep for the night. So if you find like a Burger King and a Hilton Hotel, you know that those are good places to eat and stay. If everything was foreign, it would make your life a lot harder.
    2. To preserve a country’s culture and identity, they can limit the amount of American companies in foreign countries. For example: McDonald’s has many franchises everywhere in China. Maybe, China can cut the amount of McDonald’s franchises and put in a traditional Chinese restaurant instead. Also, countries can limit foreign books or movies. Furthermore, citizens of a country can buy more products that are made within the country. If they buy foreign goods such as clothes or technological products, it will most likely affect them in cultural way. But if they buy their own products, then their culture will be preserved. They can also advertise products that are made within the country, and not products that were imported from foreign countries.
31. Alex Saenz February 6, 2012 at 10:53 pm

    Alex Saenz
    2-6-12
    2nd
    Blog #31: Cultural Imperialism
    1. Cultural imperialism can bring many advantages to other countries. Cultural imperialism helps to promote businesses and bring them money. At the same time, it can bring that other country money too. If citizens input money to the business, then it’s going to give back to society a little. Also, the business gains popularity, and eventually more countries are going to want that business. Cultural imperialism also brings new experiences to other countries. American businesses and traditions can introduce themselves into other societies. More people would be familiar with the things that everyone else knows about, and other traditions would be known in these countries. It can bring people together, because people would be able to talk about certain things and understand each other. If someone from America asked someone in another country about Starbucks, they would be able to say, “Yes! I know what you’re talking about!” Someone in a country without a Starbucks would have no clue what you are talking about. Cultural imperialism helps people feel more “in the loop.” People feel as though they can connect and relate better with other people, and they know more about what is going on in society.
    2. Other countries can preserve their own culture and identity through limitations. Countries can limit how much American imperialism infiltrates their country. They can either bring a lot of it in, or only allow certain businesses to come in. They do have the ability to turn down businesses, or bring more in. And instead of bringing in so much cultural imperialism, they can have more of their own businesses and culture. Their culture does not have to be completely wiped out if they bring in some American companies. A country having their own sense of identity and their own sense of togetherness is better than “feeling more American” or trying to be more Americanized. Even keeping alive traditions from the olden days can bring a sense of togetherness to the community. Countries shouldn’t try to completely turn themselves over trying to be like someone else; they shouldn’t totally be opposed to cultural imperialism either, though. They should bring in reasonable amounts while not letting their traditions die.
32. Sara Pawloski February 6, 2012 at 11:19 pm

    1. Yes, I think there can be an up-side to cultural imperialism. Not only does cultural imperialism help give other countries an idea of what other cultures are used throughout the world, but it also gives people a way to relate to other countries and areas. If people are able to relate to other places in the world then they will be able to understand those places if they were ever to visit. The pre-knowledge of the cultures and beliefs would help people adjust easier if they were to visit or to move somewhere new in the world. Imagine what the world would be like if nobody knew anything about other areas of the world. It would be terrible for people who have to travel and it would be harder to communicate with and understand people from other parts of the world.

    2. I think that other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by following in America’s footsteps. They need to start creating huge successful companies that will be able to grow and become popular in other parts of the world, just as the U.S. has done in the past with places such as McDonalds and Starbucks. There are many things that can be done for places to make and identity for themselves. From seeing so many comments coming from foreign places on Youtube videos of American celebrities, I can see that the American stars are very popular in other places, not just America. I don’t hear very much about stars from other places in the world. If more stars were to breakout from different regions and became popular worldwide, then those starts could grab the attention of people living in different countries which would shed light on the areas that the stars are coming from. Celebrities alone give the U.S. a lot of its publicity and make America’s culture very well known.
33. Danielle Borovsky February 6, 2012 at 11:20 pm

    1. I think that there may be some upsides to cultural imperialism but there are many disadvantages to it also. Cultural imperialism is encouraging monopoly’s of the mega- corporations that are American based by encouraging them to appeal to other country’s. Also it is causing many country’s to lose their own individual style and culture. I think that maybe instead of us sending so much of our influence overseas we should try to being some trends over to America. I personally think the easiest would be through fashion. If so many other country’s want to shop at the places we
    shop at why wouldn’t we enjoy some of their stores too! That way the trade seems almost fair!

    2. I think the only way that other countrys could preserve their identity is if we as Americans showed an interest in their products. Rather than us going to China and using some local star to support Mcdonalds the other countrys should use the same tatics with us. They could use Brad Pitt to advertise some foreign cologne and all of the sudden we could be bringing other cultures here. Another way that country’s could preserve their own culture is by making company’s like McDonalds, Starbucks and Nike but based off of their country’s trends. Just I think the overall issue with the preserving of their identity if the fact that media portrays America as having all the best trends and everyone wants to look American. So if we, Americans, were supporting company’s in China, Britain, Australia and Japan then maybe those products would appeal more to the natives of those country’s.
34. Emily Scherrer February 6, 2012 at 11:37 pm

    1)I think that there is an upside to cultural imperialism. American companies such as Starbucks and McDonald’s are very popular in America. They each have something special about them. Starbuck’s provides quality coffee, and McDonalds provides very fast food. I think that countries other that America see that there are special companies like that and wish that they had them too. Now that they do have them, they feel like they have the same privileges that Americans have every day and it makes them just as special as America. Also, I think that if you are visiting a country you have never been to before and you see familiar companies such as Starbucks it makes you feel more comfortable in your surroundings.
    2) I think that countries can preserve their own culture and identity by creating their own original companies. If they create companies that a very largely successful America will eventually want to bring that company to our country. Then, that country will feel as if they created something just as special as your average McDonalds. I do not really understand why countries other than America are so fascinated by a fast food branch such as McDonald’s. It is very unhealthy for our country and everyone eating food from it. It is cheap product and doesn’t benefit anyone’s health in any way what so ever. I think that if there was no such thing as McDonald’s and everyone’s countries had just local restaurants that were quality dining that it would improve America’s health. However, I do think companies such as Starbucks who provide quality product are beneficial to America. If there is a company that provides quality it is completely different then a company that doesn’t. With the economy going down these days and the prices of everything going up, the prices of products are beginning to mean a lot. People are starting to forget that quality should come over quantity and that is what is destroying so many companies today. I think countries should create their own original companies to preserve their originality and culture.
35. Jabrielle Johnson February 7, 2012 at 12:25 am

    1. I think that there is an up-side to cultural imperialism; the fact that it brings different countries together. There are many countries around the world full of different cultures, but we are very far away. I believe doing this makes it seem like we are right next door rather than bodies of water away. This makes it so that we are one; receiving and taking the same things. Even though we are far away, we are still the same. It is also great for companies because they receive more money this way, thus creating more jobs. More jobs means a stronger economy so, it’s a win win. Companies get more branding, humans stay connected even though they are far away, and people receive jobs. Cultural imperialism helps people to keep their jobs and also brands other countries allowing people to experience what they have to offer if they lived there. We all still remain connected.

    2. I believe that other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the “American consumer tsunami” by also following under imperialism thoughts and showing their products in our country. Showing both our products and theirs will help both of our economies. You can still maintain your own culture while at the same time experiencing another. When promoting the product, however, never make it competitive unless your product is better. That way you don’t present another country as being better in comparison and you get your citizens to pick your products. If you chose not to make it competitive then it will be even better because you get the likes of citizens in other countries and there is no room for disputes. This way you still get a feel for other countries but you don’t forget who you are in the process.
36. Megan Van Ermen February 7, 2012 at 3:33 am

    1. I do think that there could be an upside to cultural imperialism. It can be comforting to people knowing that a little bit of home and its traditions are in many places throughout the world. When cultures collide it can be kind of rough. Change can be tough at times and most people don’t enjoy having to adjust and learn about something new. But gaining different aspects and traditions can be helpful. Other people and countries can help to make America progress and become a lot more advance. The methods that someone might use could be helpful to others on the other side of the world. Imagine if America’s culture had influenced little things around the world, I think that many countries around the world might become a little more progressed. Also learning about other countries and their traditions and gaining some of their ideas could potentially help people to respect and care more about people other than themselves.

    2. Although cultural imperialism could be a good thing, restrictions should definitely be in place so that other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American Consumer tsunami. Learning and gaining new aspects from different cultures could be nice, but each country needs to be its own. Each country has different ideas and traditions and diversity is essential. I think that placing restrictions on large companies on how much they can globalize might help countries to preserve their own culture. I think that every country needs to be its own, and not adjust to become more of another. But having ideas and aspects of other countries could really help to make the world more progressed.
37. Clark Lindsay February 7, 2012 at 7:48 am

    1. Yes, there can be an upside to cultural imperialism. Cultural imperialism can help to educate less educated and developed countries even if they don’t realize it. In a country where the literacy rate is low, throwing up all sorts of posters for popular American companies would in a way forcefully inject reading into the lives of people who have never needed nor wanted to read before. This provides everyone with the opportunity to learn to read and write. And when a successful company like McDonalds comes into a third world country they would help to provide jobs for those that so dearly need them, which would also provide further education (in the form of work experience) to a people that may not have a formal system of education. And although cultural imperialism can help, it can of course hurt as well.

    2. Other countries could easily be overwhelmed by American consumerism. However, these countries can also preserve their own identities while still allowing American consumerism into their societies. If a developing country starts having McDonalds popping up left and right then many of them would quickly try to learn all of the American trends that come with it, but many of them would also hold onto their own heritage. If a country completely holds onto its own heritage then it can never receive the economic support of such large companies, but if they hold onto their own heritage and adapt small American trends and ideas into their lives, ones that won’t drastically effect them, then they can receive jobs and “help” from the super-powered juggernaut companies (McDonalds, Starbucks, etc.). So by allowing American consumerism in they don’t necessarily have to totally succumb to American trends and ideas, but they can instead impart them into their own lives and culture; hopefully with a benefit.
38. Alex Blitstein February 7, 2012 at 8:03 am

    1. I do think there can be an up side to cultural imperialism. The up side would not be anywhere near how bad the downside because of all the different downsides. One of the up sides to cultural imperialism is not knowing anywhere to go and eat. You would then see a McDonalds and be able to go and eat there. This would make you not as confused as you would be in another country. Also if you do not speak the language of another country it can help you get places with the familiar logos. There are also the up sides with schools. When schools may not be able to afford the type of food or machine they want so they can get a discount from a huge company. If schools also don’t have enough for a computer lab then one company might charge less but will have to change all of the computers.
    2. Other countries can easily preserve there own culture. They should try and never start to eat at the American fast food chains and stick to there own favorite restaurants. The y can easily avoid how bad the American food is for them and stick to there own food. With clothing they should try and stick with whatever there culture wears. They could do a reverse reaction with everyone changing and then one person going back and making them all change back to their cultures clothes. One main thing other countries can try to do is start there own chains and then get them moved to America. This would make the American citizen very happy to see a change in food choices and are able to get new ones. This would help put the certain bad restaurants in there country down and out of business.
39. Sarah Pidgeon February 7, 2012 at 8:04 am

    1. I think that there are definite upsides to cultural imperialism. The fact that you can go to different countries and see brand names that you know and trust that you are getting a good product, is all that matters. The big scandal of knowing “what’s in your food?” is the exact reason why cultural imperialism works. If you’re in a foreign country, by going to a brand name store, you know what you’re eating, and what your buying. You learn more about the country and culture when you’re not worried about whats going into your body. Also, it unifies countries by bringing them together on common ground, like food and clothing. By having something in common, it increases our foreign trade, and open door policy.

    2. Other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by instating restrictions do need to be in place, because you can’t have too much of the same thing, because if we had a completely unified society and all brand names, there would be no diversity. Also each country needs to be its own place, and have its own ideas. Although cultural imperialism has many upsides, the fact is that by unifying unique countries you are also destroying its cultural impact on the world. When visiting a country I look forward to observing the countries unique culture and enjoy observing the differences from my own everyday society. But cultural imperialism still needs to exist to ensure people are getting a quality product and knowing what they are buying. But, with all that said, restrictions must be in place to make sure that our world does not become a monochromatic, boring, bland society. With new technologies and advances our ability to make the world a completely unified society becomes greater each day, but we must do our job to make sure we keep it diverse.
40. Tim Dijkstra February 7, 2012 at 8:11 am

    1. I believe that there are some up sides to cultural imperialism. However, the negative aspects do far more damage than the positives can do good. For example, if a “high quality” restaurant such as McDonalds were to expand its business to a small upcoming nation it would limit or even destroy the possibility of smaller stores or chains to make an impact in that market. Allowing corporations to limitlessly expand to other nations does nothing but promote monopolies. Also the regions that these corporations invade suffer a cultural lose. When corporations set up shop in these other countries, it is only in the interest of making money. They have little or no regard for the people of that country. Corporations like Nike not only outsource their labor, which hurts America’s economy, but they also force their workers to live and work in horrible conditions. Many of the general public does not know what goes on behind the scenes. All they see is a product on a shelf or a burger in bag.

    2. In order for other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami, there needs to be more restrictions put on the large corporations, the countries that we try to expand to need a chance to create their own mega – corporations. Without stronger restrictions the mega – corporations of America will quickly become monopolies and squash out any foreign competition. The only way for these countries to have a fighting chance is to give them time to establish their own mega – corporations. When these corporations become large enough those countries will not only preserve their culture but they may actually have a chance to expand it to the rest of the world. One region does not require one culture, there can be blend of cultures that has far more benefits than just having one.
41. Lucas A 3rd hour February 7, 2012 at 8:27 am

    1. Yes because when you want to learn about different countries you need to be sure that you have to get a quality product. For example when the British took over India the good thatcame of this cultural imperlism is most of the country was literate and had much better schooling. cultural imperialism is when one countries culture try’s to take over the rest. This can be a good thing because if One countries culture is succeeding then They can help the rest of the world to succeed,this could be a very good thing for the world cause it can help people get out of debt and help them to be a good country. 

     2. countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami by not lettin them into your country. It could be hard for them to do but it is definatly possible. An easy way for this to happen us just to not buy any of there goods. If you boycott them, it will show people that they don’t need to buy their goods and support them. F they are able to do this than try can also be able To keep them out of their country. If a culture wants to preserve their ways than all they have to do is isolate them from other countries and only buy and sell things that they make. 
42. Mitchell August February 7, 2012 at 8:45 am

    1. There is an upside down to cultural imperialism, with the involvement of international business some of the best, most highly demanded products come in to America and other countries. Knowing that a lot of restaurants, stores, and shops are from other countries people will generally change their opinion. The idea of cultural imperialism is one that offends people but may be a necessary part of cultures all across the world. Many of my favorite products are not made in the United States and are not sold at companies that are originally from America. With all of these upsides there are also down sides to this, fast food, cars and other products that can cause damage to the economy and the people’s health. A lot of people do not want to be like America and this leaves the economic argument left to the side. However I believe this is the biggest issue! No one wants other countries coming in and causing damage to people and the economy.

    2. Other countries have to be able to imitate American products and other services if they want to keep their people happy without the involvement of American industry. Fast food, cars, and services are all things America offers that are individual and can destroy another countries economy. To avoid this countries must attempt to recreate a fast food industry the mimics the one America has also they must do this with other products.
43. Carly Yashinsky- 3rd Hour February 7, 2012 at 8:57 am

    1. Can there be an up-side to cultural imperialism? If so, what is it and why? If not, why not?
    I personally think that there is only one downside to cultural imperialism, the fact that workers in other countries for the company most likely do not have rights and probably have child labor. That is a huge downside, but if that was fixed I honestly do not think that cultural imperialism is a bad thing. I just think there is a comforting side to American cultural imperialism. When you get to another county, (not like I’d know because I’ve only been to Canada, but I’ve heard.) there can be a cultural shock. After living the culture for a while, you can just get a taste of America with a diet coke and a big Mac (yes, sadly that is the American comfort food). I don’t see how having American companies in other countries is a bad thing because people can work at the companies stores so it brings in jobs. Also, I don’t see what is bad about people wearing clothes with the store or companies logo on it, if they don’t like it, they shouldn’t buy it. Yes it is free advertising, but that’s not a bad thing, it’s just a company being smart.
    2. How do you think other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami (metaphor, work with me, o.k.?)?
    I think that other countries can’t really do anything to get rid of the American imperialist influence, except for preserving their own cultural identity. Maybe with these cultural customs, these countries could create their own huge companies that America could adopt. No one is saying that only America can make huge companies, so if other countries want to have powerful companies that preserve their own culture and identities, than they should do it because no one is stopping them. Maybe they could make a chain restaurant with their traditional foods, or a frozen drink that is custom to their country. American’s love to eat, so creating a company with their own cultural and traditional food would be a good way to start promoting a countries own culture and identity in America.
44. Joshu Vance February 7, 2012 at 9:05 am

    1. I think that there can be an up-side to cultural imperialism. For one, you can learn different things about new cultures. This can spread different cultures to different countries. It can blend some things together and can help different people get along. Fitting in with the society that surrounds you is so important (especially for one’s social life). It makes being accepted by the community that much easier. This can apply to a normal person simply trying to fit in with his or her surroundings or a country trying to be accepted by the world as an international power. I think a very important aspect of cultural imperialism is that it can relate countries to one another. If the U.S., for example, doesn’t accept Japan’s culture but wants to trade with them for a basic resource, Japan will probably not want to trade. If Japan feels that their culture is respected by Americans and that the Americans have an empathetic view, than the trade would occur. Cultural imperialism can also bring good brands to other countries. If the brand can bring a higher production to one society, it can likely benefit another. Cultural imperialism can bring countries together and make countries more production.
    2. Countries can preserve their culture and not get over-whelmed by the American consumer tsunami creating their own companies and supporting those or just promoting their own cultures. The country should have a major company created from itself in order to help the country stay rooted to its culture. Countries must preserve their own identities. I wouldn’t want to eat at an American restaurant if I was in another country, anyways. An important way of promoting one’s own culture would be to support their roots. There has to be some strong aspects of your own culture that would cause it to resist assimilating to a foreign super-market.
45. Grant Bail February 7, 2012 at 9:19 am

    1.There is an upside to cultural imperialism. I think one of the up-sides would be that it spreads different cultures to other counties. This applies to countries that are extremely far from each other geographically and are very different culturally get a taste of what other cultures around the world are like. It would be a very intersting experience for the countries that it happens to and expand horizons for how people in countries look at other countries. It could give people a sense of cultural unity, because they can relate and realize that they share common interests as other people from other countries. There are many cons when dealing with cultural imperialism, such as working conditions and working ages, There are definitely more pros than cons when looking at cultural imperialism. Also, a benefit for America can be seen when they use ideas such as cultural imperialism because it gives them more influence and power across the globe.
    2. Other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumeristic tendencies by promoting their own culture more than American culture. We can see this with China’s Communist Party and consistenly denouncing American Values, yet still China has a fasiciantion with rock and roll. It doesn’t have to be one or the other, there can be a blending of both cultures. Also, other countries can promote their culture in countries other than their own, and help spread their culture to other places around the world. Other countries don’t advertise and publicize their identity and culture as much as America, because most countries look up to us as a model of culture and although that may be because they are not as influential of a country, it is still possible. If other countries make their citizens as attached and excited about their culture as America does to its citizens, it would not be as hard to preserve
    their own culture in the ever changing tides of culture and globilization.
46. Katie Quasarano 3rd Hour February 7, 2012 at 10:01 am

    1. No. There is not an “up-side” to cultural imperialism at all. Though many would disagree with me, saying that imperialism gives global equality and tastes of American culture. I would say we have a very different definition of “up-side”. The question is: up-side for whom? The companies selling overseas receive endless benefits from cultural Imperialism, but the countries we sell our products are often given the short end of the stick. While the large corporations are given a bigger consumer base by entering other countries, the small businesses of the natives are often seriously affected. Like small businesses here in the US are killed by large competition, the businesses in other countries hardly stand a chance. If the question is, does an up-side exist? The answer is yes, for the CEOs of Nike, McDonald’s, Starbucks, and Coke. An “up-side” should be considered what benefits the majority of people, and they and their countries suffer far too much from cultural Imperialism.
    2. Other countries should not give in to American control of their consumers. If countries were self-sufficient, producing a majority of their product inside the country and only importing things they cannot make, economy inside the country would be better. America itself has given far too much to corporations as it is. Other countries need to support their local industries and preserve their culture. If large companies continue to collect all the cash, eventually they will be the ones with all of the power. If this doesn’t stop, old tradition will be lost and the world will be completely controlled by the prices of the only goods on the market. People need to see that this is a problem, and the government of both the U.S and other countries need to get involved in limiting how much control one company can have.
47. Emma Dolan February 7, 2012 at 10:15 am

    1. There is definitely an upside to cultural imperialism, but the positive aspects are far outweighed by the negative. With cultural imperialism comes with political stability and a boosted economy, especially for the subordinate country. By relying on one another, countries can help themselves and create ties spanning the earth. In addition, cultural imperialism provides common ground between different countries; giving an opportunity for foreign consumers of the same product to connect with one another and learn of each other’s methods and language. Cultural imperialism gives room for growth in regard to both countries involved, especially in an economic sense. It allows an opportunity for alliance and trade. Although these upsides are important and beneficial, cultural imperialism destroys the individuality and ethnicity independent countries develop. Oftentimes foreign advertisement uproots the calm countries create for themselves, especially in regard to religion. Countries with religious affiliation and law could face violence and revolt when foreign influence comes into pay. Plus, corporations smothering a country’s culture will never be a good thing. In moderation, cultural imperialism is good. Today, it has expanded far past giving a common ground, instead forcing us to become more and more like one another.
    2. It’s possible for other countries to avoid being wiped out by the “consumer tsunami” simply by preserving their own culture. It’s possible to allow other cultures to infiltrate into one’s own—in reality, it allows for growth and acceptance to wind its way into cultures on opposite poles of the theoretical magnet. In addition, countries could place a restriction on foreign goods and advertisement, instead allowing for their own products to take over the majority of the market. Even with restrictions, American corporations could still make their way into foreign countries and trade their; considerably lessening our mutual dependence and influence on one another.
48. Merrill Watzman February 7, 2012 at 10:29 am

    1. Yes, I believe that there can definitely be an upside to cultural imperialism, despite some of the negative impacts it has on society. If you are traveling to another country, for example, you can be comforted by seeing a familiar company whose products you can depend on like a chain fast-food restaurant such as McDonald’s. Another upside to cultural imperialism is the money that the United States makes from big corporations such as McDonald’s and Starbucks, which can attract people to buying more American things, or even travel to the United States. Some people consider the downsides of cultural imperialism to be the disruption and destruction of customs and traditions of other countries around the world. Also, another downside could be that cultural imperialism is encouraging American companies to monopolize the market. The business and money that these companies make in other countries outweighs the negative impacts it has on them. The downsides can be controlled because countries can decide for themselves how many American companies they want. Simple things can be done to preserve a country’s identity and culture.
    2. I think that other countries can preserve their culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American customer Tsunami by simply controlling how many American companies they allow to come to their country. It would be smart if the country analyzes businesses that want to expand into their country and determine which ones would make the most money, but not monopolize the industry and take local companies out of business. In America, we adopt different aspects of other cultures all the time, but always preserve our own. Other countries can do the same-adopt certain parts of other cultures that they like, but make an effort to keep their culture alive, whether it involves not buying into monopolies or encouraging more local, smaller businesses to open.
49. Sam Frederik February 7, 2012 at 10:57 am

    1. I believe that there can be an up-side to imperialism, and that up-side is that, whether it is a country taking over another country or a corporation taking over a smaller business, they will be introducing their successful methods to their newly conquered brethren. If one country or corporation is strong enough to take over other countries or corporations, respectfully, then they obviously have to be doing something right. If Starbucks were to take over a smaller coffee company, then they would display their techniques and business strategies that have gotten them to the top. If a country takes over another country, then they can introduce their probable strong military force, successful economic system, and advanced technologies that the conquered country may not possess. Although the ideals of imperialism could be considered a game of who is more powerful than who, it all comes down to what the winning side has to offer.
    2. I think that if a country works to make a perfectly-balanced cooperation between the beliefs and traditions of their original culture, and a steady economy like the United States, that country could become extremely valuable. Just because a population may work to incorporate the American ways of life into their country’s economic system does not signify that they must give up their cultural portfolio. In fact, if you have to give up a significant portion of your culture to make room for the American “consumer tsumani” (yeah, Mr. Wickersham, I see you), then you should avoid trying to incorporate them. On the other hand, I believe that there really isn’t a country that has managed to accomplish what America has. We developed our consumer tsumani by ourselves, but America has always been a mixing pot of different cultures. Although our consuming habits can spiral out of control sometimes, we still manage to balance a steady economic system with cultures from all around the world, and that’s what makes America great.
50. Logan Mendelson February 7, 2012 at 11:00 am

    1) Cultural imperialism can have an upside. The successful country is basically helping the weaker country by taking it over and rebuilding its systems and educating the people of the nation who weren’t before. The problem would bet that the parent country would take away all of the traditions. In this way, the new country is able to in turn share some values and ideas with the imperialists. The imperialists would only have new resources instead of possibly valuable knowledge. If the new nation does well, the surrounding countries may WANT to join the imperialist country and better themselves by the same means. The upside benefits outweigh the cons in the situation. Another upside is that companies are able to expand to a wider variety of people and places. The company is able to lead America and give the US an “in” into the country. That’s a major upside for today’s world, especially for chains like McDonalds.

    2) I think other countries can preserve their own culture and identity without being overwhelmed by the American consumer tsunami. They can do so by being smart and not being played and outsmarted. Since the new nation isn’t necessarily indigenous and native, they should be able to figure out just the right amount of influence they need. If they limit the power of the new companies that expand to their nation, they can control how much involvement the imperialists actually have. They want the change though, so allowing it somewhat is important. Also, their economy won’t fully on America’s economy. The countries should keep their own cultures intact by not absorbing all American customs. It should be a ratio that is more in favor of their culture with some American culture blended in. That is how they can prevent being overwhelmed and stay a little independent and true to their beginnings.